
- Rating · 3 mo
- 1.16
- Rating · career
- 1.08
- MVPs
- 4
- EVPs
- 23
- Best Top 20
- #42019
- Trophies
- 23
- Majors
- 17
HLTV numbers · Career
- Rating 1.0
- 1.08
- KPR
- 0.75
- DPR
- 0.68
- ADR
- 83.0
- KAST
- 71.6%
- HS%
- –
- Maps
- 2300
- Rounds
- 58238
- K/D
- 1.10
- K–D
- +3874
Opening duels
- Won
- 7562
- Lost
- 7036
- Ratio
- 1.07
Clutches
–
Multi-kills
- 2K
- 7887
- 3K
- 2474
- 4K
- 550
- 5K
- 75
Stats: HLTV.org
By map, event and opponentPlayer of the Match ×9
- Maps
- 102
- W–L
- 40–62
- Rating
- 1.11
- K–D
- -40
- ADR
- 78.5
- KAST
- 70.5%
By map
By event
| Event | Maps | W–L | Rating | K–D | ADR | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESL Pro League Season 23: Online Stage | 13 | 5–8 | 1.09 | -9 | 76.0 | 70.1% |
| StarLadder Budapest Major 2025 | 13 | 6–7 | 1.10 | -2 | 76.4 | 69.5% |
| PGL Masters Bucharest 2026 | 12 | 5–7 | 0.96 | -34 | 74.6 | 66.6% |
| BLAST Open Spring 2026 | 7 | 2–5 | 1.27 | +14 | 86.7 | 68.0% |
| CS Asia Championships 2026 | 7 | 3–4 | 1.08 | -9 | 72.9 | 74.0% |
| Intel Extreme Masters Atlanta 2026 | 7 | 2–5 | 1.01 | -19 | 75.5 | 69.6% |
| Intel Extreme Masters Cologne Major 2026 | 7 | 3–4 | 1.18 | +1 | 81.2 | 73.8% |
| Intel Extreme Masters Kraków 2026 | 7 | 3–4 | 1.01 | -15 | 71.7 | 70.5% |
| BLAST Bounty Winter 2026: Closed Qualifier | 6 | 4–2 | 1.27 | +13 | 87.4 | 74.0% |
| Logitech G Play Connect 2026 | 5 | 2–3 | 1.31 | +17 | 96.1 | 79.6% |
| 1win Private Club #2 | 4 | 0–4 | 0.94 | -6 | 72.0 | 65.0% |
| BLAST Bounty Summer 2026: Closed Qualifier | 4 | 4–0 | 1.54 | +30 | 95.0 | 79.3% |
| Intel Extreme Masters Rio 2026 | 3 | 0–3 | 0.89 | -10 | 67.5 | 70.9% |
| PGL Masters Bucharest 2025 | 3 | 1–2 | 0.98 | -5 | 72.8 | 58.7% |
| BLAST Bounty Summer 2026 | 2 | 0–2 | 1.03 | -9 | 74.8 | 71.1% |
| BLAST Bounty Winter 2026 | 2 | 0–2 | 1.09 | +3 | 84.9 | 66.7% |
By opponent
| Opponent | Maps | W–L | Rating | K–D | ADR | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 | 3–5 | 1.08 | 0 | 77.1 | 75.3% | |
| 8 | 6–2 | 1.31 | +26 | 86.2 | 71.7% | |
| 6 | 4–2 | 1.21 | +1 | 80.6 | 78.2% | |
| 6 | 0–6 | 1.05 | -22 | 73.5 | 68.0% | |
| 6 | 1–5 | 1.26 | +8 | 86.2 | 71.6% | |
| 5 | 3–2 | 1.04 | 0 | 75.5 | 72.9% | |
| 4 | 2–2 | 1.13 | -4 | 78.8 | 66.3% | |
| 4 | 0–4 | 0.84 | -20 | 69.3 | 62.0% | |
| 4 | 0–4 | 0.88 | -21 | 74.8 | 66.7% | |
| 3 | 1–2 | 1.04 | -5 | 77.6 | 69.0% | |
| 3 | 1–2 | 0.94 | -10 | 63.9 | 66.7% | |
| 3 | 2–1 | 1.02 | +1 | 77.1 | 69.0% | |
| 3 | 2–1 | 1.22 | +5 | 80.2 | 67.6% | |
| 3 | 2–1 | 1.02 | -6 | 80.1 | 69.2% | |
| 3 | 1–2 | 0.98 | -5 | 72.8 | 58.7% | |
| 3 | 2–1 | 1.42 | +15 | 91.5 | 70.5% | |
| 3 | 2–1 | 0.93 | -1 | 65.0 | 71.4% | |
| 2 | 0–2 | 1.06 | -5 | 71.4 | 73.8% | |
| 2 | 0–2 | 1.08 | -5 | 81.6 | 62.9% | |
| 2 | 0–2 | 0.89 | -6 | 80.9 | 59.4% | |
| 2 | 0–2 | 0.96 | -5 | 74.0 | 65.8% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 1.39 | +10 | 88.3 | 88.1% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 0.87 | -6 | 68.7 | 61.4% | |
| 2 | 0–2 | 0.64 | -18 | 51.8 | 71.1% | |
| 2 | 0–2 | 1.09 | +3 | 84.9 | 66.7% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 1.60 | +15 | 93.2 | 75.6% | |
| 2 | 0–2 | 0.98 | 0 | 64.9 | 69.5% | |
| 1 | 0–1 | 1.42 | +1 | 89.0 | 70.0% | |
| 1 | 0–1 | 1.24 | +3 | 97.6 | 89.5% | |
| 1 | 1–0 | 1.63 | +6 | 103.4 | 78.3% | |
| 1 | 0–1 | 1.09 | -2 | 72.6 | 81.8% | |
| 1 | 0–1 | 1.35 | +8 | 101.2 | 76.7% | |
| 1 | 0–1 | 1.04 | 0 | 87.9 | 68.4% | |
| 1 | 1–0 | 1.15 | -1 | 76.2 | 71.4% |
By tier
| Tier | Maps | W–L | Rating | K–D | ADR | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S-Tier | 80 | 29–51 | 1.07 | -89 | 76.5 | 69.8% |
| A-Tier | 22 | 11–11 | 1.24 | +49 | 86.6 | 73.1% |
Worked out from the HLTV scoreboards of the player's maps in this period.
Data: Liquipedia (CC BY-SA 3.0)