- Rating · 3 mo
- 1.16
- Rating · career
- 1.10
- MVPs
- 2
- EVPs
- 19
- Best Top 20
- #92019
- Trophies
- 25
- Majors
- 11
HLTV numbers · Career
- Rating 1.0
- 1.10
- KPR
- 0.72
- DPR
- 0.63
- ADR
- 77.1
- KAST
- 74.0%
- HS%
- –
- Maps
- 2141
- Rounds
- 53811
- K/D
- 1.16
- K–D
- +5340
Opening duels
- Won
- 4814
- Lost
- 4544
- Ratio
- 1.06
Clutches
–
Multi-kills
- 2K
- 6945
- 3K
- 2260
- 4K
- 503
- 5K
- 67
Stats: HLTV.org
By map, event and opponentPlayer of the Match ×1
- Maps
- 139
- W–L
- 66–73
- Rating
- 1.18
- K–D
- +116
- ADR
- 75.7
- KAST
- 72.6%
By map
By event
| Event | Maps | W–L | Rating | K–D | ADR | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| StarLadder Budapest Major 2025 | 29 | 19–10 | 1.23 | +55 | 77.5 | 74.1% |
| XSE Pro League 2026 | 14 | 9–5 | 1.26 | +31 | 74.5 | 77.7% |
| Stake Ranked Episode 2 | 12 | 7–5 | 1.31 | +36 | 77.7 | 73.0% |
| BLAST Rivals Spring 2026 | 10 | 4–6 | 1.03 | -13 | 73.3 | 69.6% |
| ESL Pro League Season 23: Online Stage | 10 | 4–6 | 1.00 | -28 | 71.1 | 65.6% |
| PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026 | 10 | 4–6 | 1.24 | +8 | 79.8 | 71.1% |
| Intel Extreme Masters Kraków 2026 | 7 | 2–5 | 1.03 | -15 | 69.5 | 76.6% |
| BLAST Bounty Summer 2026 | 6 | 3–3 | 1.06 | -11 | 68.6 | 71.7% |
| Intel Extreme Masters Atlanta 2026 | 6 | 2–4 | 1.12 | 0 | 78.5 | 70.3% |
| BLAST Bounty Summer 2026: Closed Qualifier | 5 | 4–1 | 1.27 | +15 | 79.7 | 76.6% |
| BLAST Open Spring 2026 | 5 | 1–4 | 1.14 | -1 | 71.1 | 70.8% |
| Esports World Cup 2026 | 5 | 3–2 | 1.24 | +5 | 79.5 | 76.6% |
| FISSURE Playground #3 | 5 | 1–4 | 1.30 | +25 | 79.1 | 71.6% |
| Intel Extreme Masters Chengdu 2025 | 5 | 1–4 | 1.22 | +3 | 77.6 | 67.3% |
| Stake Ranked Episode 4 | 5 | 1–4 | 1.14 | +6 | 79.8 | 65.6% |
| BLAST Bounty Winter 2026: Closed Qualifier | 3 | 1–2 | 0.99 | -3 | 66.7 | 78.6% |
| PGL Bucharest 2026 | 2 | 0–2 | 1.15 | +3 | 73.0 | 77.3% |
By opponent
| Opponent | Maps | W–L | Rating | K–D | ADR | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | 2–7 | 1.01 | -15 | 69.7 | 68.3% | |
| 8 | 2–6 | 1.11 | -8 | 78.3 | 63.6% | |
| 8 | 5–3 | 1.23 | +12 | 77.5 | 76.7% | |
| 7 | 2–5 | 1.16 | -1 | 79.4 | 69.1% | |
| 6 | 4–2 | 1.19 | +9 | 64.7 | 77.9% | |
| 6 | 2–4 | 1.15 | -3 | 75.2 | 75.7% | |
| 6 | 2–4 | 1.13 | 0 | 70.6 | 74.2% | |
| 6 | 2–4 | 1.29 | +20 | 81.3 | 70.4% | |
| 5 | 4–1 | 1.28 | +17 | 76.3 | 78.2% | |
| 5 | 2–3 | 0.97 | -9 | 67.7 | 73.2% | |
| 5 | 2–3 | 1.23 | +21 | 85.5 | 70.2% | |
| 5 | 1–4 | 0.90 | -18 | 66.1 | 63.8% | |
| 4 | 2–2 | 1.53 | +24 | 80.3 | 75.6% | |
| 4 | 1–3 | 0.81 | -16 | 59.0 | 70.0% | |
| 4 | 1–3 | 1.06 | -6 | 72.1 | 72.3% | |
| 4 | 2–2 | 0.97 | -10 | 65.5 | 67.4% | |
| 3 | 2–1 | 1.26 | +11 | 77.2 | 70.3% | |
| 3 | 1–2 | 1.72 | +21 | 92.1 | 79.1% | |
| 3 | 2–1 | 1.42 | +14 | 80.5 | 85.7% | |
| 3 | 3–0 | 1.29 | +8 | 79.0 | 84.5% | |
| 3 | 2–1 | 0.97 | -7 | 68.8 | 64.2% | |
| 3 | 2–1 | 1.39 | +8 | 86.6 | 75.8% | |
| 3 | 2–1 | 1.22 | +6 | 83.6 | 76.2% | |
| 3 | 3–0 | 1.01 | -10 | 74.9 | 73.3% | |
| 3 | 2–1 | 1.25 | -1 | 70.9 | 78.4% | |
| 3 | 1–2 | 1.12 | +1 | 73.6 | 63.5% | |
| 3 | 1–2 | 1.31 | +7 | 76.6 | 66.1% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 1.34 | 0 | 80.9 | 82.5% | |
| 2 | 0–2 | 1.15 | +3 | 73.0 | 77.3% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 1.79 | +18 | 96.9 | 85.0% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 1.29 | +4 | 84.0 | 77.0% | |
| 2 | 0–2 | 1.16 | +3 | 80.6 | 63.5% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 1.60 | +11 | 86.0 | 85.7% | |
| 1 | 1–0 | 1.34 | +8 | 97.3 | 77.8% | |
| 1 | 0–1 | 0.68 | -6 | 52.3 | 63.2% |
By tier
| Tier | Maps | W–L | Rating | K–D | ADR | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S-Tier | 98 | 44–54 | 1.16 | +28 | 75.5 | 71.7% |
| A-Tier | 41 | 22–19 | 1.24 | +88 | 76.2 | 74.6% |
Worked out from the HLTV scoreboards of the player's maps in this period.
Data: Liquipedia (CC BY-SA 3.0)
