
- Rating · 3 mo
- 1.04
- Rating · career
- 1.08
- MVPs
- 0
- EVPs
- 4
- Best Top 20
- –
- Trophies
- 14
- Majors
- 9
HLTV numbers · Career
- Rating 2.0
- 1.08
- KPR
- 0.69
- DPR
- 0.66
- ADR
- 75.7
- KAST
- 71.7%
- HS%
- –
- Maps
- 1612
- Rounds
- 40401
- K/D
- 1.04
- K–D
- +1114
Opening duels
- Won
- 4078
- Lost
- 4161
- Ratio
- 0.98
Clutches
–
Multi-kills
- 2K
- 4988
- 3K
- 1488
- 4K
- 299
- 5K
- 39
Stats: HLTV.org
By map, event and opponentPlayer of the Match ×4
- Maps
- 176
- W–L
- 106–70
- Rating
- 1.06
- K–D
- -128
- ADR
- 65.9
- KAST
- 72.1%
By map
By event
| Event | Maps | W–L | Rating | K–D | ADR | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PGL Astana 2026 | 18 | 11–7 | 1.04 | -28 | 69.8 | 72.2% |
| BLAST Open Fall 2026 | 13 | 7–6 | 1.17 | +5 | 67.3 | 74.5% |
| BLAST Open Spring 2026 | 13 | 7–6 | 1.16 | +20 | 72.0 | 77.1% |
| CS Asia Championships 2026 | 12 | 8–4 | 1.11 | +6 | 70.3 | 72.0% |
| ESL Pro League Season 24 | 12 | 7–5 | 1.16 | +15 | 67.3 | 74.4% |
| Intel Extreme Masters Chengdu 2025 | 11 | 8–3 | 1.02 | -22 | 59.1 | 71.8% |
| Intel Extreme Masters Cologne Major 2026 | 11 | 6–5 | 1.17 | +13 | 68.3 | 70.8% |
| Intel Extreme Masters Rio 2026 | 11 | 8–3 | 1.15 | +9 | 67.3 | 69.9% |
| PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026 | 11 | 7–4 | 0.99 | -20 | 60.5 | 73.4% |
| StarLadder Budapest Major 2025 | 11 | 5–6 | 0.91 | -33 | 63.5 | 71.1% |
| Thunderpick World Championship 2026 | 11 | 6–5 | 0.99 | -22 | 64.3 | 65.4% |
| BLAST Rivals Fall 2025 | 10 | 7–3 | 0.93 | -20 | 61.9 | 70.0% |
| Intel Extreme Masters Kraków 2026 | 10 | 5–5 | 0.95 | -27 | 65.1 | 68.4% |
| BLAST Bounty Winter 2026 | 8 | 4–4 | 0.98 | -27 | 59.0 | 73.3% |
| Esports World Cup 2026 | 7 | 5–2 | 0.95 | -13 | 53.5 | 71.5% |
| BLAST Bounty Winter 2026: Closed Qualifier | 4 | 4–0 | 1.56 | +23 | 87.8 | 81.5% |
| BLAST Bounty Summer 2026: Closed Qualifier | 3 | 1–2 | 1.04 | -7 | 66.7 | 77.0% |
By opponent
| Opponent | Maps | W–L | Rating | K–D | ADR | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17 | 9–8 | 1.06 | -47 | 69.5 | 73.4% | |
| 17 | 6–11 | 0.95 | -43 | 60.3 | 69.6% | |
| 14 | 6–8 | 1.04 | -23 | 65.2 | 69.7% | |
| 11 | 5–6 | 1.05 | -5 | 64.7 | 72.6% | |
| 11 | 7–4 | 0.93 | -24 | 55.9 | 67.1% | |
| 9 | 5–4 | 1.28 | +24 | 71.0 | 78.7% | |
| 8 | 4–4 | 0.89 | -25 | 62.0 | 60.1% | |
| 8 | 6–2 | 1.06 | -6 | 61.8 | 78.4% | |
| 8 | 1–7 | 1.00 | -21 | 64.7 | 71.8% | |
| 7 | 6–1 | 1.10 | +16 | 70.8 | 70.4% | |
| 7 | 6–1 | 1.27 | +19 | 62.3 | 82.2% | |
| 6 | 6–0 | 1.06 | +7 | 60.0 | 71.7% | |
| 6 | 3–3 | 1.09 | -5 | 70.9 | 77.9% | |
| 5 | 1–4 | 1.04 | -2 | 66.5 | 67.0% | |
| 5 | 4–1 | 1.11 | -1 | 71.2 | 73.1% | |
| 5 | 4–1 | 0.94 | -9 | 56.2 | 70.3% | |
| 4 | 4–0 | 1.07 | -1 | 64.4 | 65.0% | |
| 3 | 1–2 | 1.04 | -7 | 66.7 | 77.0% | |
| 3 | 2–1 | 1.22 | -2 | 72.9 | 71.5% | |
| 3 | 3–0 | 1.03 | -2 | 61.3 | 75.4% | |
| 3 | 2–1 | 1.60 | +19 | 87.7 | 79.0% | |
| 3 | 3–0 | 1.10 | +6 | 73.9 | 81.5% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 1.70 | +12 | 94.6 | 79.0% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 0.89 | -3 | 61.2 | 65.5% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 1.19 | +5 | 74.0 | 75.0% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 1.06 | -5 | 69.4 | 76.5% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 1.06 | +4 | 76.7 | 71.0% | |
| 1 | 0–1 | 0.78 | -8 | 67.4 | 65.2% | |
| 1 | 1–0 | 1.00 | +1 | 73.7 | 58.3% | |
| 1 | 1–0 | 1.16 | -2 | 97.0 | 78.6% |
By tier
| Tier | Maps | W–L | Rating | K–D | ADR | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S-Tier | 169 | 101–68 | 1.05 | -144 | 65.4 | 71.8% |
| A-Tier | 7 | 5–2 | 1.34 | +16 | 78.7 | 79.6% |
Worked out from the HLTV scoreboards of the player's maps in this period.
Data: Liquipedia (CC BY-SA 3.0)