Techno
- Rating · 3 mo
- 0.95
- Rating · career
- 1.01
- MVPs
- 0
- EVPs
- 0
- Best Top 20
- –
- Trophies
- 0
- Majors
- 0
HLTV numbers · Career
- Rating 2.0
- 1.01
- KPR
- 0.65
- DPR
- 0.68
- ADR
- 71.5
- KAST
- 70.0%
- HS%
- –
- Maps
- 937
- Rounds
- 22404
- K/D
- 0.95
- K–D
- -706
Opening duels
- Won
- 1991
- Lost
- 2402
- Ratio
- 0.83
Clutches
–
Multi-kills
- 2K
- 2536
- 3K
- 784
- 4K
- 146
- 5K
- 14
Stats: HLTV.org
By map, event and opponentPlayer of the Match ×4
- Maps
- 162
- W–L
- 85–77
- Rating
- 0.99
- K–D
- -267
- ADR
- 66.4
- KAST
- 69.3%
By map
By event
| Event | Maps | W–L | Rating | K–D | ADR | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026 | 19 | 9–10 | 0.98 | -15 | 66.5 | 71.5% |
| PGL Bucharest 2026 | 15 | 10–5 | 1.14 | +5 | 75.3 | 71.1% |
| 1win Private Club #2 | 14 | 11–3 | 1.09 | -2 | 70.9 | 74.7% |
| Intel Extreme Masters Chengdu 2025 | 13 | 6–7 | 1.07 | +14 | 71.7 | 68.3% |
| Intel Extreme Masters Cologne Major 2026 | 13 | 6–7 | 0.90 | -43 | 61.9 | 66.9% |
| CS Asia Championships 2026 | 12 | 7–5 | 0.95 | -16 | 65.9 | 71.9% |
| PGL Astana 2026 | 11 | 5–6 | 0.99 | -27 | 63.7 | 68.6% |
| PGL Masters Bucharest 2026 | 11 | 4–7 | 1.00 | -25 | 67.2 | 67.9% |
| BLAST Open Spring 2026 | 10 | 6–4 | 1.06 | -4 | 71.0 | 67.3% |
| ESL Pro League Season 23: Online Stage | 9 | 6–3 | 0.91 | -53 | 56.3 | 68.8% |
| Esports World Cup 2026 | 8 | 4–4 | 0.87 | -28 | 56.6 | 64.1% |
| StarLadder Budapest Major 2025 | 7 | 4–3 | 0.90 | -18 | 61.1 | 69.9% |
| BLAST Bounty Summer 2026: Closed Qualifier | 5 | 4–1 | 1.01 | -4 | 66.7 | 72.4% |
| BLAST Rivals Fall 2025 | 5 | 1–4 | 0.86 | -12 | 66.2 | 66.7% |
| Intel Extreme Masters Kraków 2026 | 5 | 1–4 | 0.92 | -15 | 71.3 | 66.0% |
| BLAST Bounty Summer 2026 | 3 | 1–2 | 0.85 | -13 | 63.9 | 63.8% |
| ESL Pro League Season 23 | 2 | 0–2 | 0.74 | -11 | 53.0 | 65.9% |
By opponent
| Opponent | Maps | W–L | Rating | K–D | ADR | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | 4–7 | 0.97 | -21 | 67.5 | 67.1% | |
| 11 | 1–10 | 0.90 | -42 | 64.8 | 65.6% | |
| 10 | 8–2 | 1.11 | +4 | 66.6 | 76.5% | |
| 9 | 4–5 | 1.11 | -3 | 69.0 | 72.9% | |
| 9 | 4–5 | 0.94 | -11 | 69.2 | 67.4% | |
| 8 | 5–3 | 0.89 | -25 | 69.8 | 67.0% | |
| 8 | 3–5 | 0.92 | -18 | 63.7 | 67.7% | |
| 8 | 2–6 | 1.03 | -17 | 72.0 | 59.6% | |
| 8 | 7–1 | 1.28 | +25 | 82.1 | 77.3% | |
| 6 | 4–2 | 1.12 | +7 | 74.8 | 75.8% | |
| 6 | 4–2 | 0.90 | -11 | 64.7 | 66.4% | |
| 6 | 5–1 | 0.92 | -8 | 64.3 | 75.2% | |
| 5 | 4–1 | 1.09 | -10 | 68.0 | 76.0% | |
| 5 | 2–3 | 0.92 | -23 | 59.1 | 73.6% | |
| 5 | 3–2 | 1.15 | -2 | 64.1 | 74.1% | |
| 5 | 1–4 | 0.78 | -23 | 53.0 | 60.4% | |
| 5 | 5–0 | 1.20 | +13 | 70.2 | 69.2% | |
| 4 | 0–4 | 1.03 | -6 | 75.0 | 67.8% | |
| 4 | 2–2 | 0.75 | -24 | 56.7 | 61.8% | |
| 4 | 4–0 | 1.15 | +10 | 71.5 | 67.8% | |
| 3 | 1–2 | 0.85 | -8 | 57.4 | 65.7% | |
| 3 | 2–1 | 0.79 | -20 | 56.2 | 71.2% | |
| 3 | 1–2 | 0.91 | -9 | 67.2 | 69.2% | |
| 2 | 0–2 | 0.58 | -13 | 43.9 | 57.1% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 1.06 | +4 | 65.2 | 80.0% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 0.88 | -6 | 53.1 | 77.5% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 1.16 | +1 | 80.7 | 72.5% | |
| 2 | 0–2 | 0.78 | -14 | 49.5 | 54.7% | |
| 2 | 0–2 | 0.79 | -12 | 65.6 | 67.3% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 1.05 | 0 | 67.2 | 61.5% | |
| 1 | 0–1 | 0.70 | -9 | 35.2 | 70.0% | |
| 1 | 1–0 | 1.41 | +4 | 81.8 | 93.8% |
By tier
| Tier | Maps | W–L | Rating | K–D | ADR | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S-Tier | 128 | 60–68 | 0.96 | -266 | 65.0 | 68.4% |
| A-Tier | 34 | 25–9 | 1.10 | -1 | 72.2 | 72.7% |
Worked out from the HLTV scoreboards of the player's maps in this period.
Data: Liquipedia (CC BY-SA 3.0)