
- Rating · 3 mo
- 1.35
- Rating · career
- 1.14
- MVPs
- 1
- EVPs
- 1
- Best Top 20
- #62023
- Trophies
- 10
- Majors
- 6
HLTV numbers · Career
- Rating 2.0
- 1.14
- KPR
- 0.71
- DPR
- 0.59
- ADR
- 72.6
- KAST
- 73.6%
- HS%
- –
- Maps
- 1008
- Rounds
- 24524
- K/D
- 1.21
- K–D
- +3068
Opening duels
- Won
- 2908
- Lost
- 1884
- Ratio
- 1.54
Clutches
–
Multi-kills
- 2K
- 3148
- 3K
- 904
- 4K
- 200
- 5K
- 19
Stats: HLTV.org
By map, event and opponentPlayer of the Match ×7
- Maps
- 139
- W–L
- 75–64
- Rating
- 1.12
- K–D
- +333
- ADR
- 69.7
- KAST
- 75.0%
By map
By event
| Event | Maps | W–L | Rating | K–D | ADR | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESL Pro League Season 23: Online Stage | 22 | 11–11 | 1.20 | +89 | 72.5 | 76.5% |
| Intel Extreme Masters Cologne Major 2026 | 20 | 12–8 | 1.06 | +30 | 66.6 | 73.4% |
| Intel Extreme Masters Kraków 2026 | 16 | 9–7 | 1.05 | +7 | 64.2 | 70.1% |
| PGL Astana 2026 | 14 | 7–7 | 1.14 | +34 | 70.4 | 74.9% |
| PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026 | 12 | 6–6 | 1.04 | +20 | 71.1 | 74.7% |
| Intel Extreme Masters Rio 2026 | 10 | 5–5 | 1.16 | +30 | 74.3 | 75.7% |
| Stake Ranked Episode 1 | 10 | 8–2 | 1.04 | +30 | 61.0 | 78.2% |
| Intel Extreme Masters Chengdu 2025 | 9 | 4–5 | 1.05 | +15 | 69.1 | 77.3% |
| PGL Masters Bucharest 2026 | 9 | 6–3 | 1.29 | +50 | 74.4 | 78.4% |
| StarLadder Budapest Major 2025 | 9 | 3–6 | 1.10 | +3 | 70.2 | 72.9% |
| BLAST Rivals Spring 2026 | 8 | 4–4 | 1.21 | +25 | 76.7 | 76.6% |
By opponent
| Opponent | Maps | W–L | Rating | K–D | ADR | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14 | 5–9 | 1.14 | +28 | 73.3 | 72.9% | |
| 12 | 6–6 | 1.10 | +29 | 66.9 | 73.3% | |
| 9 | 1–8 | 1.18 | +23 | 77.0 | 71.4% | |
| 8 | 4–4 | 1.11 | +23 | 70.6 | 73.4% | |
| 6 | 4–2 | 0.98 | +12 | 58.4 | 76.0% | |
| 6 | 3–3 | 1.18 | +24 | 75.9 | 79.1% | |
| 6 | 2–4 | 0.81 | -17 | 59.4 | 68.9% | |
| 6 | 2–4 | 1.03 | -14 | 68.6 | 71.8% | |
| 5 | 3–2 | 1.35 | +28 | 73.5 | 81.3% | |
| 5 | 1–4 | 0.88 | -18 | 59.7 | 63.9% | |
| 5 | 4–1 | 0.99 | +10 | 64.6 | 70.9% | |
| 4 | 4–0 | 1.23 | +12 | 68.7 | 82.7% | |
| 4 | 0–4 | 1.12 | +6 | 74.3 | 79.5% | |
| 4 | 0–4 | 1.24 | +9 | 70.4 | 73.3% | |
| 4 | 2–2 | 1.13 | -1 | 67.8 | 72.7% | |
| 4 | 3–1 | 1.34 | +27 | 76.7 | 77.8% | |
| 4 | 3–1 | 1.08 | +7 | 59.8 | 75.3% | |
| 4 | 3–1 | 1.01 | +17 | 70.9 | 74.2% | |
| 3 | 2–1 | 1.14 | +12 | 70.3 | 81.1% | |
| 3 | 3–0 | 1.33 | +13 | 72.5 | 78.1% | |
| 3 | 2–1 | 1.06 | +12 | 64.9 | 83.3% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 1.39 | +16 | 81.8 | 82.5% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 1.08 | +7 | 68.9 | 86.5% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 1.34 | +14 | 78.3 | 84.4% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 0.98 | +3 | 68.9 | 73.2% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 1.26 | +9 | 73.2 | 76.0% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 1.33 | +10 | 86.8 | 80.5% | |
| 2 | 0–2 | 1.03 | +4 | 68.8 | 76.1% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 1.06 | +3 | 65.3 | 65.4% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 1.48 | +16 | 85.0 | 87.8% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 0.94 | +9 | 52.6 | 88.5% |
By tier
| Tier | Maps | W–L | Rating | K–D | ADR | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S-Tier | 129 | 67–62 | 1.12 | +303 | 70.3 | 74.8% |
| A-Tier | 10 | 8–2 | 1.04 | +30 | 61.0 | 78.2% |
Worked out from the HLTV scoreboards of the player's maps in this period.
Data: Liquipedia (CC BY-SA 3.0)