
- Rating · 3 mo
- 1.18
- Rating · career
- 1.14
- MVPs
- 0
- EVPs
- 1
- Best Top 20
- –
- Trophies
- 2
- Majors
- 2
HLTV numbers · Career
- Rating 2.0
- 1.14
- KPR
- 0.75
- DPR
- 0.66
- ADR
- 79.2
- KAST
- 72.5%
- HS%
- –
- Maps
- 1087
- Rounds
- 25890
- K/D
- 1.13
- K–D
- +2253
Opening duels
- Won
- 2381
- Lost
- 2132
- Ratio
- 1.12
Clutches
–
Multi-kills
- 2K
- 3511
- 3K
- 1122
- 4K
- 239
- 5K
- 24
Stats: HLTV.org
By map, event and opponentPlayer of the Match ×3
- Maps
- 96
- W–L
- 44–52
- Rating
- 1.18
- K–D
- +177
- ADR
- 75.7
- KAST
- 72.9%
By map
By event
| Event | Maps | W–L | Rating | K–D | ADR | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESL Pro League Season 23: Online Stage | 19 | 9–10 | 1.13 | +32 | 74.0 | 75.9% |
| Stake Ranked Episode 3 | 12 | 9–3 | 1.24 | +37 | 77.0 | 76.3% |
| Stake Ranked Episode 1 | 10 | 6–4 | 1.29 | +42 | 79.3 | 71.0% |
| Intel Extreme Masters Chengdu 2025 | 9 | 4–5 | 0.99 | -18 | 64.3 | 65.7% |
| PGL Astana 2026 | 9 | 3–6 | 1.11 | +3 | 72.4 | 66.9% |
| PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026 | 8 | 2–6 | 0.98 | -7 | 67.6 | 75.8% |
| Intel Extreme Masters Cologne Major 2026 | 6 | 2–4 | 1.16 | +2 | 78.3 | 71.4% |
| Intel Extreme Masters Kraków 2026 | 5 | 1–4 | 1.21 | +8 | 76.1 | 65.3% |
| Stake Ranked Episode 2 | 5 | 1–4 | 1.21 | +15 | 84.8 | 71.8% |
| BLAST Bounty Winter 2026: Closed Qualifier | 4 | 4–0 | 1.67 | +39 | 89.1 | 80.0% |
| BLAST Bounty Summer 2026: Closed Qualifier | 3 | 1–2 | 1.36 | +11 | 89.2 | 70.2% |
| BLAST Bounty Winter 2026 | 3 | 1–2 | 1.10 | -1 | 63.5 | 79.2% |
| PGL Masters Bucharest 2025 | 3 | 1–2 | 1.32 | +14 | 86.6 | 81.7% |
By opponent
| Opponent | Maps | W–L | Rating | K–D | ADR | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 | 2–6 | 1.07 | +2 | 71.6 | 71.8% | |
| 7 | 4–3 | 1.15 | +19 | 77.5 | 68.1% | |
| 6 | 2–4 | 1.17 | +8 | 75.4 | 67.7% | |
| 6 | 2–4 | 1.12 | -1 | 74.3 | 64.2% | |
| 5 | 4–1 | 1.26 | +14 | 70.9 | 80.8% | |
| 5 | 1–4 | 1.32 | +20 | 87.8 | 75.2% | |
| 5 | 3–2 | 1.11 | +9 | 68.8 | 74.5% | |
| 3 | 1–2 | 1.27 | +13 | 84.7 | 80.5% | |
| 3 | 1–2 | 0.81 | -12 | 55.7 | 78.0% | |
| 3 | 3–0 | 1.34 | +14 | 84.6 | 81.4% | |
| 3 | 1–2 | 1.14 | +4 | 74.0 | 71.2% | |
| 3 | 2–1 | 1.01 | -1 | 62.9 | 79.4% | |
| 3 | 2–1 | 1.16 | +8 | 71.3 | 73.1% | |
| 3 | 1–2 | 1.13 | -5 | 72.5 | 61.1% | |
| 3 | 1–2 | 1.30 | +5 | 78.6 | 66.7% | |
| 2 | 0–2 | 1.08 | +3 | 74.3 | 69.3% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 1.43 | +15 | 81.6 | 77.8% | |
| 2 | 0–2 | 0.89 | -7 | 66.3 | 74.4% | |
| 2 | 0–2 | 0.96 | +1 | 74.8 | 75.0% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 1.85 | +23 | 87.2 | 83.3% | |
| 2 | 0–2 | 1.06 | -2 | 71.9 | 70.8% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 1.59 | +13 | 108.9 | 75.6% | |
| 2 | 0–2 | 0.65 | -11 | 53.9 | 66.7% | |
| 2 | 0–2 | 1.21 | +4 | 76.3 | 76.0% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 1.16 | +7 | 81.7 | 70.5% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 1.38 | +10 | 76.8 | 82.1% | |
| 2 | 0–2 | 1.11 | -3 | 66.2 | 69.1% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 1.68 | +19 | 95.7 | 78.4% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 1.54 | +16 | 90.5 | 77.5% | |
| 1 | 0–1 | 0.90 | -7 | 66.7 | 73.9% | |
| 1 | 0–1 | 0.86 | -1 | 63.5 | 66.7% |
By tier
| Tier | Maps | W–L | Rating | K–D | ADR | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S-Tier | 59 | 22–37 | 1.09 | +19 | 71.5 | 71.8% |
| A-Tier | 37 | 22–15 | 1.31 | +158 | 81.7 | 74.5% |
Worked out from the HLTV scoreboards of the player's maps in this period.
Data: Liquipedia (CC BY-SA 3.0)