
- Rating · 3 mo
- 1.02
- Rating · career
- 1.06
- MVPs
- 0
- EVPs
- 2
- Best Top 20
- –
- Trophies
- 4
- Majors
- 4
HLTV numbers · Career
- Rating 2.0
- 1.06
- KPR
- 0.66
- DPR
- 0.64
- ADR
- 73.4
- KAST
- 71.5%
- HS%
- –
- Maps
- 736
- Rounds
- 17005
- K/D
- 1.04
- K–D
- +450
Opening duels
- Won
- 1534
- Lost
- 1471
- Ratio
- 1.04
Clutches
–
Multi-kills
- 2K
- 1957
- 3K
- 605
- 4K
- 95
- 5K
- 5
Stats: HLTV.org
By map, event and opponentPlayer of the Match ×5
- Maps
- 166
- W–L
- 93–73
- Rating
- 1.05
- K–D
- -5
- ADR
- 68.4
- KAST
- 71.2%
By map
By event
| Event | Maps | W–L | Rating | K–D | ADR | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESL Pro League Season 23: Online Stage | 16 | 13–3 | 1.21 | +38 | 77.7 | 75.5% |
| PGL Masters Bucharest 2025 | 16 | 9–7 | 1.12 | +16 | 72.1 | 72.8% |
| Intel Extreme Masters Cologne Major 2026 | 15 | 7–8 | 0.80 | -56 | 51.1 | 69.0% |
| CS Asia Championships 2026 | 14 | 10–4 | 1.15 | +19 | 74.5 | 71.3% |
| Esports World Cup 2026 | 14 | 9–5 | 1.21 | +31 | 69.8 | 73.9% |
| FISSURE Playground #3 | 13 | 11–2 | 1.24 | +31 | 83.3 | 76.0% |
| PGL Bucharest 2026 | 13 | 6–7 | 0.98 | +2 | 67.0 | 73.5% |
| Intel Extreme Masters Atlanta 2026 | 12 | 9–3 | 0.99 | -5 | 60.0 | 76.3% |
| ESL Pro League Season 24 | 10 | 4–6 | 0.99 | -8 | 66.7 | 68.1% |
| BLAST Open Fall 2026 | 8 | 4–4 | 0.91 | -16 | 63.6 | 68.5% |
| PGL Masters Bucharest 2026 | 8 | 2–6 | 1.05 | +1 | 70.3 | 70.4% |
| Thunderpick World Championship 2026 | 8 | 4–4 | 0.86 | -22 | 58.7 | 61.6% |
| StarLadder Budapest Major 2025 | 7 | 3–4 | 1.02 | +1 | 69.7 | 68.2% |
| Intel Extreme Masters Rio 2026 | 5 | 1–4 | 0.82 | -18 | 60.3 | 61.6% |
| Intel Extreme Masters Kraków 2026 | 4 | 0–4 | 1.01 | -9 | 67.4 | 65.1% |
| ESL Pro League Season 23 | 3 | 1–2 | 0.97 | -10 | 65.2 | 61.4% |
By opponent
| Opponent | Maps | W–L | Rating | K–D | ADR | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 | 9–6 | 0.92 | -28 | 59.7 | 66.4% | |
| 11 | 4–7 | 1.09 | +3 | 73.3 | 72.2% | |
| 11 | 7–4 | 1.22 | +15 | 77.9 | 77.6% | |
| 11 | 6–5 | 1.07 | -6 | 69.0 | 66.5% | |
| 9 | 6–3 | 1.09 | 0 | 67.8 | 72.4% | |
| 8 | 5–3 | 1.01 | -6 | 67.2 | 67.0% | |
| 7 | 5–2 | 1.26 | +21 | 83.6 | 78.7% | |
| 7 | 5–2 | 1.06 | +7 | 69.2 | 77.5% | |
| 6 | 1–5 | 0.92 | -12 | 66.3 | 64.2% | |
| 5 | 3–2 | 0.99 | 0 | 64.0 | 67.3% | |
| 5 | 1–4 | 0.71 | -24 | 52.0 | 56.6% | |
| 5 | 2–3 | 1.07 | +3 | 69.9 | 64.3% | |
| 4 | 4–0 | 1.28 | +18 | 88.2 | 77.5% | |
| 4 | 2–2 | 0.98 | -5 | 68.3 | 72.2% | |
| 4 | 3–1 | 0.77 | -16 | 59.7 | 66.7% | |
| 4 | 3–1 | 1.04 | -1 | 62.3 | 74.2% | |
| 4 | 4–0 | 1.04 | +10 | 67.3 | 77.0% | |
| 3 | 1–2 | 0.78 | -8 | 48.6 | 70.2% | |
| 3 | 2–1 | 1.17 | +9 | 69.6 | 82.5% | |
| 3 | 2–1 | 1.04 | -3 | 65.2 | 75.8% | |
| 3 | 3–0 | 1.32 | +18 | 87.5 | 85.2% | |
| 3 | 2–1 | 1.12 | 0 | 69.5 | 70.3% | |
| 3 | 1–2 | 0.82 | -14 | 56.2 | 69.9% | |
| 3 | 2–1 | 1.19 | +6 | 82.0 | 68.6% | |
| 3 | 2–1 | 1.34 | +12 | 78.3 | 74.6% | |
| 2 | 0–2 | 1.06 | -3 | 63.3 | 69.0% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 1.04 | 0 | 61.4 | 88.9% | |
| 2 | 0–2 | 0.98 | -5 | 63.0 | 60.5% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 1.21 | +4 | 74.1 | 72.4% | |
| 2 | 0–2 | 0.74 | -2 | 49.3 | 67.5% | |
| 2 | 0–2 | 0.88 | -7 | 68.4 | 62.0% | |
| 2 | 0–2 | 1.13 | +4 | 77.1 | 73.9% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 1.13 | +9 | 67.9 | 82.2% | |
| 2 | 0–2 | 0.82 | -8 | 57.4 | 70.5% | |
| 2 | 0–2 | 0.79 | -10 | 50.4 | 59.5% | |
| 1 | 1–0 | 1.15 | +4 | 73.2 | 78.9% | |
| 1 | 1–0 | 1.60 | +10 | 83.9 | 73.7% |
By tier
| Tier | Maps | W–L | Rating | K–D | ADR | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S-Tier | 137 | 78–59 | 1.04 | -23 | 68.1 | 70.8% |
| A-Tier | 29 | 15–14 | 1.06 | +18 | 69.9 | 73.1% |
Worked out from the HLTV scoreboards of the player's maps in this period.
Data: Liquipedia (CC BY-SA 3.0)