
- Rating · 3 mo
- 0.99
- Rating · career
- 1.13
- MVPs
- 0
- EVPs
- 2
- Best Top 20
- –
- Trophies
- 6
- Majors
- 3
HLTV numbers · Career
- Rating 2.0
- 1.13
- KPR
- 0.75
- DPR
- 0.70
- ADR
- 80.5
- KAST
- 71.8%
- HS%
- –
- Maps
- 1171
- Rounds
- 27999
- K/D
- 1.07
- K–D
- +1430
Opening duels
- Won
- 3325
- Lost
- 3261
- Ratio
- 1.02
Clutches
–
Multi-kills
- 2K
- 3767
- 3K
- 1255
- 4K
- 301
- 5K
- 40
Stats: HLTV.org
By map, event and opponentPlayer of the Match ×9
- Maps
- 192
- W–L
- 99–93
- Rating
- 1.10
- K–D
- -32
- ADR
- 71.8
- KAST
- 72.8%
By map
By event
| Event | Maps | W–L | Rating | K–D | ADR | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESL Pro League Season 23: Online Stage | 22 | 11–11 | 1.24 | +59 | 78.7 | 74.4% |
| Intel Extreme Masters Cologne Major 2026 | 20 | 12–8 | 1.01 | -17 | 67.1 | 73.6% |
| FISSURE Playground #3 | 19 | 11–8 | 1.07 | -23 | 70.6 | 68.7% |
| Intel Extreme Masters Kraków 2026 | 16 | 9–7 | 1.18 | +14 | 78.0 | 75.8% |
| PGL Astana 2026 | 14 | 7–7 | 1.09 | -14 | 71.0 | 71.9% |
| PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026 | 12 | 6–6 | 1.00 | -17 | 70.7 | 73.5% |
| BLAST Open Fall 2026 | 11 | 6–5 | 1.10 | +2 | 67.7 | 73.6% |
| ESL Pro League Season 24 | 10 | 4–6 | 1.18 | +6 | 71.7 | 74.4% |
| Esports World Cup 2026 | 10 | 6–4 | 0.88 | -33 | 65.7 | 67.2% |
| Intel Extreme Masters Rio 2026 | 10 | 5–5 | 1.29 | +30 | 82.8 | 74.8% |
| Stake Ranked Episode 1 | 10 | 8–2 | 1.23 | +20 | 81.2 | 79.1% |
| Intel Extreme Masters Chengdu 2025 | 9 | 4–5 | 1.18 | +7 | 70.2 | 74.4% |
| StarLadder Budapest Major 2025 | 9 | 3–6 | 1.02 | -22 | 69.7 | 69.1% |
| BLAST Rivals Spring 2026 | 8 | 4–4 | 0.89 | -21 | 64.6 | 69.5% |
| PGL Masters Bucharest 2026 | 7 | 1–6 | 0.92 | -22 | 58.2 | 69.2% |
| BLAST Bounty Summer 2026: Closed Qualifier | 5 | 2–3 | 1.17 | -1 | 70.9 | 76.2% |
By opponent
| Opponent | Maps | W–L | Rating | K–D | ADR | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14 | 6–8 | 1.01 | -19 | 66.9 | 71.0% | |
| 12 | 6–6 | 1.10 | +1 | 73.0 | 74.5% | |
| 11 | 4–7 | 1.00 | -24 | 59.9 | 67.7% | |
| 11 | 1–10 | 1.08 | -14 | 73.3 | 71.3% | |
| 11 | 3–8 | 1.10 | +13 | 70.5 | 70.0% | |
| 9 | 6–3 | 1.22 | +18 | 82.8 | 74.8% | |
| 9 | 3–6 | 0.95 | -26 | 66.8 | 67.6% | |
| 9 | 4–5 | 1.13 | -3 | 75.3 | 75.4% | |
| 8 | 5–3 | 0.94 | -28 | 67.0 | 67.8% | |
| 8 | 6–2 | 1.12 | +8 | 70.0 | 73.5% | |
| 8 | 2–6 | 0.91 | -19 | 69.1 | 73.3% | |
| 7 | 2–5 | 0.93 | -17 | 68.0 | 63.3% | |
| 6 | 2–4 | 0.87 | -34 | 65.1 | 64.5% | |
| 5 | 3–2 | 0.98 | -5 | 68.2 | 75.0% | |
| 5 | 4–1 | 1.13 | +10 | 73.2 | 73.3% | |
| 5 | 1–4 | 1.12 | -7 | 77.3 | 70.5% | |
| 5 | 2–3 | 0.95 | -12 | 70.2 | 67.3% | |
| 4 | 4–0 | 1.46 | +25 | 88.5 | 84.0% | |
| 4 | 3–1 | 1.47 | +17 | 82.8 | 79.2% | |
| 4 | 3–1 | 1.16 | +6 | 74.2 | 74.2% | |
| 3 | 1–2 | 1.12 | 0 | 66.0 | 72.9% | |
| 3 | 2–1 | 0.77 | -17 | 50.7 | 70.6% | |
| 3 | 1–2 | 0.88 | -9 | 65.3 | 69.7% | |
| 3 | 2–1 | 1.31 | +1 | 78.6 | 77.6% | |
| 3 | 3–0 | 1.19 | +6 | 76.3 | 79.4% | |
| 3 | 2–1 | 1.41 | +13 | 79.7 | 89.0% | |
| 3 | 2–1 | 1.40 | +13 | 71.4 | 82.0% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 1.80 | +17 | 106.3 | 84.7% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 1.48 | +11 | 71.8 | 78.1% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 1.26 | +5 | 71.5 | 78.0% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 1.23 | +3 | 66.1 | 80.0% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 0.79 | -4 | 68.1 | 80.5% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 1.82 | +20 | 100.0 | 75.0% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 1.59 | +19 | 94.2 | 92.7% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 1.11 | 0 | 84.1 | 85.7% |
By tier
| Tier | Maps | W–L | Rating | K–D | ADR | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S-Tier | 177 | 89–88 | 1.09 | -51 | 71.3 | 72.4% |
| A-Tier | 15 | 10–5 | 1.21 | +19 | 77.8 | 78.2% |
Worked out from the HLTV scoreboards of the player's maps in this period.
Data: Liquipedia (CC BY-SA 3.0)