
- Rating · 3 mo
- 1.07
- Rating · career
- 1.13
- MVPs
- 0
- EVPs
- 2
- Best Top 20
- #122024
- Trophies
- 8
- Majors
- 4
HLTV numbers · Career
- Rating 2.0
- 1.13
- KPR
- 0.74
- DPR
- 0.70
- ADR
- 80.5
- KAST
- 70.9%
- HS%
- –
- Maps
- 1334
- Rounds
- 31777
- K/D
- 1.06
- K–D
- +1245
Opening duels
- Won
- 4221
- Lost
- 3945
- Ratio
- 1.07
Clutches
–
Multi-kills
- 2K
- 4208
- 3K
- 1425
- 4K
- 291
- 5K
- 47
Stats: HLTV.org
By map, event and opponentPlayer of the Match ×3
- Maps
- 120
- W–L
- 52–68
- Rating
- 1.07
- K–D
- -124
- ADR
- 73.5
- KAST
- 69.6%
By map
By event
| Event | Maps | W–L | Rating | K–D | ADR | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESL Pro League Season 23: Online Stage | 22 | 11–11 | 1.02 | -28 | 74.2 | 71.1% |
| Intel Extreme Masters Kraków 2026 | 16 | 9–7 | 1.11 | +3 | 70.0 | 68.9% |
| PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026 | 12 | 6–6 | 1.11 | +2 | 77.8 | 70.8% |
| PGL Masters Bucharest 2026 | 12 | 5–7 | 1.08 | -15 | 74.0 | 68.7% |
| Intel Extreme Masters Chengdu 2025 | 9 | 4–5 | 1.12 | -2 | 84.0 | 69.0% |
| StarLadder Budapest Major 2025 | 9 | 3–6 | 0.87 | -36 | 61.5 | 65.2% |
| BLAST Open Spring 2026 | 7 | 2–5 | 1.02 | -29 | 66.9 | 68.6% |
| Intel Extreme Masters Atlanta 2026 | 7 | 2–5 | 1.22 | +15 | 83.2 | 71.7% |
| Intel Extreme Masters Cologne Major 2026 | 7 | 3–4 | 1.19 | 0 | 79.0 | 69.7% |
| CS Asia Championships 2026 | 6 | 3–3 | 1.12 | +1 | 72.9 | 73.5% |
| 1win Private Club #2 | 4 | 0–4 | 0.79 | -21 | 63.7 | 65.1% |
| BLAST Bounty Summer 2026: Closed Qualifier | 4 | 4–0 | 1.19 | +4 | 73.3 | 79.3% |
| Intel Extreme Masters Rio 2026 | 3 | 0–3 | 1.12 | -8 | 75.2 | 65.3% |
| BLAST Bounty Summer 2026 | 2 | 0–2 | 0.86 | -10 | 63.5 | 60.5% |
By opponent
| Opponent | Maps | W–L | Rating | K–D | ADR | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | 1–9 | 0.92 | -36 | 67.7 | 64.1% | |
| 9 | 3–6 | 1.07 | -25 | 70.8 | 67.5% | |
| 8 | 3–5 | 1.00 | -11 | 68.8 | 68.4% | |
| 7 | 4–3 | 1.19 | +5 | 81.3 | 77.5% | |
| 7 | 3–4 | 1.10 | -4 | 74.3 | 67.1% | |
| 6 | 0–6 | 0.98 | -24 | 70.2 | 62.1% | |
| 6 | 4–2 | 1.23 | +15 | 76.5 | 70.7% | |
| 5 | 1–4 | 1.03 | 0 | 76.0 | 70.4% | |
| 5 | 2–3 | 1.06 | -11 | 70.9 | 64.6% | |
| 5 | 2–3 | 0.81 | -25 | 66.8 | 67.0% | |
| 5 | 4–1 | 0.95 | -13 | 66.1 | 70.6% | |
| 4 | 4–0 | 1.46 | +21 | 93.6 | 78.3% | |
| 4 | 2–2 | 1.01 | -11 | 68.5 | 73.7% | |
| 4 | 3–1 | 1.25 | +2 | 77.5 | 75.3% | |
| 4 | 3–1 | 1.10 | +1 | 71.5 | 71.0% | |
| 3 | 1–2 | 0.97 | -6 | 71.9 | 67.8% | |
| 3 | 1–2 | 0.86 | -12 | 55.4 | 67.8% | |
| 3 | 2–1 | 1.21 | +4 | 69.8 | 68.6% | |
| 3 | 2–1 | 1.20 | +7 | 92.2 | 76.4% | |
| 2 | 0–2 | 1.13 | +1 | 89.9 | 70.7% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 1.81 | +14 | 119.3 | 89.2% | |
| 2 | 0–2 | 0.68 | -16 | 51.3 | 51.4% | |
| 2 | 0–2 | 0.75 | -10 | 59.1 | 54.1% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 1.26 | +6 | 70.1 | 81.0% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 1.26 | +6 | 70.7 | 70.7% | |
| 2 | 0–2 | 1.11 | +4 | 85.3 | 70.7% | |
| 2 | 0–2 | 0.81 | -11 | 67.3 | 74.0% | |
| 1 | 1–0 | 0.83 | -5 | 72.3 | 73.9% | |
| 1 | 0–1 | 1.37 | +2 | 81.4 | 68.2% | |
| 1 | 0–1 | 1.52 | +8 | 105.5 | 82.6% |
By tier
| Tier | Maps | W–L | Rating | K–D | ADR | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S-Tier | 112 | 48–64 | 1.08 | -107 | 73.9 | 69.4% |
| A-Tier | 8 | 4–4 | 0.99 | -17 | 68.5 | 72.1% |
Worked out from the HLTV scoreboards of the player's maps in this period.
Data: Liquipedia (CC BY-SA 3.0)