
- Rating · 3 mo
- 1.05
- Rating · career
- 1.16
- MVPs
- 1
- EVPs
- 4
- Best Top 20
- –
- Trophies
- 3
- Majors
- 3
HLTV numbers · Career
- Rating 2.0
- 1.16
- KPR
- 0.73
- DPR
- 0.70
- ADR
- 82.6
- KAST
- 73.6%
- HS%
- –
- Maps
- 636
- Rounds
- 13782
- K/D
- 1.04
- K–D
- +401
Opening duels
- Won
- 2015
- Lost
- 1993
- Ratio
- 1.01
Clutches
–
Multi-kills
- 2K
- 1809
- 3K
- 558
- 4K
- 132
- 5K
- 15
Stats: HLTV.org
By map, event and opponentPlayer of the Match ×25
- Maps
- 181
- W–L
- 99–82
- Rating
- 1.17
- K–D
- +44
- ADR
- 80.0
- KAST
- 73.0%
By map
By event
| Event | Maps | W–L | Rating | K–D | ADR | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| StarLadder Budapest Major 2025 | 17 | 11–6 | 1.21 | +12 | 80.7 | 76.8% |
| Intel Extreme Masters Atlanta 2026 | 16 | 12–4 | 1.13 | -6 | 76.2 | 76.5% |
| PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026 | 15 | 8–7 | 1.09 | -14 | 77.1 | 70.3% |
| BLAST Open Spring 2026 | 14 | 8–6 | 1.28 | +31 | 85.4 | 74.0% |
| PGL Masters Bucharest 2026 | 14 | 7–7 | 1.14 | -1 | 77.2 | 70.1% |
| ESL Pro League Season 23: Online Stage | 13 | 7–6 | 1.31 | +22 | 89.2 | 78.6% |
| ESL Pro League Season 24 | 13 | 7–6 | 1.11 | -9 | 79.2 | 69.6% |
| Intel Extreme Masters Cologne Major 2026 | 13 | 6–7 | 0.99 | -22 | 72.1 | 70.2% |
| Intel Extreme Masters Rio 2026 | 13 | 7–6 | 1.28 | +22 | 81.0 | 73.2% |
| BLAST Rivals Spring 2026 | 9 | 6–3 | 1.31 | +21 | 88.3 | 73.2% |
| ESL Pro League Season 23 | 9 | 7–2 | 1.43 | +36 | 92.3 | 80.5% |
| Intel Extreme Masters Kraków 2026 | 8 | 3–5 | 1.09 | -6 | 75.6 | 71.7% |
| BLAST Open Fall 2026 | 7 | 3–4 | 1.13 | -13 | 77.7 | 68.5% |
| Esports World Cup 2026 | 6 | 3–3 | 1.15 | 0 | 81.6 | 72.5% |
| Intel Extreme Masters Chengdu 2025 | 6 | 2–4 | 1.03 | -13 | 73.8 | 69.3% |
| StarLadder StarSeries Fall 2026 | 5 | 1–4 | 1.04 | -7 | 74.6 | 66.7% |
| BLAST Bounty Winter 2026: Closed Qualifier | 3 | 1–2 | 1.05 | -9 | 69.3 | 71.0% |
By opponent
| Opponent | Maps | W–L | Rating | K–D | ADR | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | 4–17 | 0.99 | -56 | 70.0 | 67.3% | |
| 14 | 9–5 | 1.35 | +34 | 87.2 | 75.8% | |
| 14 | 8–6 | 1.10 | -3 | 77.0 | 71.6% | |
| 12 | 10–2 | 1.29 | +23 | 87.0 | 79.5% | |
| 12 | 6–6 | 1.16 | +4 | 78.5 | 73.1% | |
| 11 | 7–4 | 1.40 | +45 | 93.2 | 77.5% | |
| 10 | 6–4 | 1.12 | +1 | 75.3 | 72.9% | |
| 9 | 3–6 | 0.99 | -27 | 71.1 | 72.4% | |
| 9 | 4–5 | 1.16 | -8 | 82.0 | 69.2% | |
| 8 | 7–1 | 1.21 | +9 | 81.7 | 77.2% | |
| 8 | 2–6 | 0.90 | -30 | 68.1 | 61.9% | |
| 7 | 5–2 | 1.40 | +23 | 89.6 | 76.5% | |
| 7 | 2–5 | 1.17 | -2 | 79.6 | 76.3% | |
| 6 | 3–3 | 1.38 | +17 | 87.8 | 76.6% | |
| 5 | 3–2 | 0.92 | -14 | 70.7 | 68.0% | |
| 4 | 3–1 | 1.31 | +9 | 90.9 | 78.9% | |
| 4 | 2–2 | 1.09 | -3 | 74.4 | 67.0% | |
| 3 | 2–1 | 1.33 | +8 | 90.7 | 82.3% | |
| 3 | 1–2 | 1.09 | -4 | 76.2 | 69.9% | |
| 3 | 1–2 | 0.96 | -11 | 66.2 | 67.3% | |
| 3 | 3–0 | 1.40 | +9 | 88.5 | 73.1% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 1.39 | +4 | 79.3 | 78.9% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 1.43 | +16 | 96.3 | 76.2% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 1.16 | -4 | 80.0 | 71.8% | |
| 1 | 1–0 | 1.22 | +3 | 86.0 | 86.7% | |
| 1 | 1–0 | 1.10 | +1 | 73.3 | 78.3% |
By tier
| Tier | Maps | W–L | Rating | K–D | ADR | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S-Tier | 178 | 98–80 | 1.17 | +53 | 80.2 | 73.0% |
| A-Tier | 3 | 1–2 | 1.05 | -9 | 69.3 | 71.0% |
Worked out from the HLTV scoreboards of the player's maps in this period.
Data: Liquipedia (CC BY-SA 3.0)