
- Rating · 3 mo
- 1.04
- Rating · career
- 1.09
- MVPs
- 0
- EVPs
- 0
- Best Top 20
- –
- Trophies
- 5
- Majors
- 5
HLTV numbers · Career
- Rating 2.0
- 1.09
- KPR
- 0.67
- DPR
- 0.64
- ADR
- 76.3
- KAST
- 72.2%
- HS%
- –
- Maps
- 2241
- Rounds
- 56305
- K/D
- 1.05
- K–D
- +1856
Opening duels
- Won
- 5208
- Lost
- 4803
- Ratio
- 1.08
Clutches
–
Multi-kills
- 2K
- 6708
- 3K
- 1969
- 4K
- 390
- 5K
- 36
Stats: HLTV.org
By map, event and opponentPlayer of the Match ×7
- Maps
- 144
- W–L
- 65–79
- Rating
- 1.09
- K–D
- -23
- ADR
- 73.2
- KAST
- 72.9%
By map
By event
| Event | Maps | W–L | Rating | K–D | ADR | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESL Pro League Season 23: Online Stage | 23 | 13–10 | 1.09 | +3 | 71.7 | 74.5% |
| PGL Bucharest 2026 | 18 | 9–9 | 1.18 | +22 | 79.1 | 76.8% |
| Logitech G Play Connect 2026 | 16 | 10–6 | 1.05 | -6 | 70.2 | 71.6% |
| StarLadder Budapest Major 2025 | 15 | 7–8 | 1.01 | -14 | 65.3 | 73.5% |
| Intel Extreme Masters Kraków 2026 | 11 | 6–5 | 1.21 | +24 | 77.5 | 74.8% |
| Stake Ranked Episode 3 | 9 | 5–4 | 1.12 | +12 | 80.4 | 72.8% |
| 1win Private Club #1 | 7 | 3–4 | 1.25 | +5 | 83.2 | 72.8% |
| Intel Extreme Masters Rio 2026 | 6 | 2–4 | 1.28 | -3 | 76.4 | 67.8% |
| PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026 | 6 | 0–6 | 0.97 | -11 | 62.6 | 70.7% |
| BLAST Bounty Summer 2026: Closed Qualifier | 5 | 4–1 | 1.04 | +2 | 72.4 | 69.6% |
| Intel Extreme Masters Chengdu 2025 | 5 | 1–4 | 0.94 | -19 | 65.1 | 71.0% |
| Stake Ranked Episode 2 | 5 | 1–4 | 1.11 | +2 | 76.8 | 69.6% |
| XSE Pro League 2026 | 5 | 1–4 | 1.08 | -2 | 75.0 | 64.7% |
| CS Asia Championships 2026 | 4 | 1–3 | 0.95 | -16 | 74.5 | 73.9% |
| BLAST Bounty Summer 2026 | 3 | 1–2 | 1.08 | -7 | 74.6 | 73.4% |
| BLAST Bounty Winter 2026: Closed Qualifier | 3 | 1–2 | 0.87 | -13 | 66.8 | 72.9% |
| Esports World Cup 2026 | 3 | 0–3 | 1.04 | -2 | 67.8 | 77.0% |
By opponent
| Opponent | Maps | W–L | Rating | K–D | ADR | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 | 5–3 | 1.26 | +23 | 77.9 | 77.0% | |
| 7 | 6–1 | 1.17 | +16 | 74.7 | 76.8% | |
| 7 | 3–4 | 0.93 | -19 | 68.4 | 69.8% | |
| 7 | 2–5 | 0.92 | -11 | 70.0 | 70.1% | |
| 6 | 0–6 | 0.83 | -28 | 59.6 | 69.1% | |
| 6 | 3–3 | 1.04 | +2 | 73.4 | 70.3% | |
| 6 | 2–4 | 0.91 | -8 | 63.8 | 68.3% | |
| 6 | 0–6 | 1.02 | -12 | 63.9 | 64.2% | |
| 6 | 3–3 | 1.10 | -7 | 82.6 | 75.4% | |
| 5 | 3–2 | 1.41 | +15 | 85.8 | 73.8% | |
| 5 | 1–4 | 1.07 | 0 | 76.3 | 70.2% | |
| 5 | 3–2 | 0.86 | -17 | 67.8 | 68.5% | |
| 5 | 3–2 | 1.10 | +3 | 72.8 | 74.6% | |
| 5 | 4–1 | 0.96 | -3 | 68.4 | 78.9% | |
| 5 | 1–4 | 0.93 | -3 | 62.0 | 69.8% | |
| 4 | 0–4 | 0.75 | -33 | 58.0 | 61.3% | |
| 4 | 2–2 | 1.22 | +5 | 77.8 | 80.0% | |
| 4 | 1–3 | 1.08 | -2 | 74.8 | 76.3% | |
| 3 | 1–2 | 1.11 | +6 | 79.1 | 77.0% | |
| 3 | 1–2 | 1.21 | +7 | 76.9 | 75.0% | |
| 3 | 1–2 | 0.94 | -9 | 62.8 | 77.8% | |
| 3 | 2–1 | 1.25 | +1 | 70.6 | 76.6% | |
| 3 | 1–2 | 1.08 | -7 | 74.6 | 73.4% | |
| 3 | 0–3 | 0.80 | -16 | 54.5 | 58.2% | |
| 3 | 2–1 | 1.57 | +22 | 92.8 | 81.0% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 2.13 | +24 | 128.2 | 87.9% | |
| 2 | 1–1 | 1.15 | +3 | 67.1 | 66.7% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 1.02 | 0 | 76.1 | 71.5% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 1.39 | +5 | 74.8 | 76.6% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 1.41 | +11 | 93.8 | 82.9% | |
| 2 | 0–2 | 1.09 | +2 | 80.8 | 74.3% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 1.30 | +7 | 83.5 | 80.5% | |
| 2 | 0–2 | 0.80 | -14 | 60.2 | 65.1% | |
| 1 | 0–1 | 1.49 | +3 | 104.9 | 68.2% | |
| 1 | 1–0 | 0.80 | -2 | 55.4 | 76.7% | |
| 1 | 1–0 | 1.23 | 0 | 69.9 | 70.0% | |
| 1 | 0–1 | 1.09 | -3 | 78.3 | 63.2% | |
| 1 | 1–0 | 1.87 | +10 | 102.5 | 80.0% | |
| 1 | 1–0 | 1.56 | +6 | 78.7 | 87.5% |
By tier
| Tier | Maps | W–L | Rating | K–D | ADR | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S-Tier | 76 | 31–45 | 1.07 | -45 | 70.6 | 73.3% |
| A-Tier | 68 | 34–34 | 1.11 | +22 | 75.8 | 72.5% |
Worked out from the HLTV scoreboards of the player's maps in this period.
Data: Liquipedia (CC BY-SA 3.0)