
- Rating · 3 mo
- 1.05
- Rating · career
- 1.23
- MVPs
- 0
- EVPs
- 4
- Best Top 20
- –
- Trophies
- 0
- Majors
- 2
HLTV numbers · Career
- Rating 3.0
- 1.23
- KPR
- 0.82
- DPR
- 0.70
- ADR
- 87.8
- KAST
- 74.4%
- HS%
- –
- Maps
- 477
- Rounds
- 10449
- K/D
- 1.17
- K–D
- +1216
Opening duels
- Won
- 1467
- Lost
- 1267
- Ratio
- 1.16
Clutches
–
Multi-kills
- 2K
- 1577
- 3K
- 545
- 4K
- 121
- 5K
- 13
Stats: HLTV.org
By map, event and opponentPlayer of the Match ×8
- Maps
- 166
- W–L
- 100–66
- Rating
- 1.18
- K–D
- +246
- ADR
- 81.3
- KAST
- 73.0%
By map
By event
| Event | Maps | W–L | Rating | K–D | ADR | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PGL Astana 2026 | 18 | 11–7 | 1.25 | +38 | 85.9 | 73.1% |
| BLAST Open Fall 2026 | 13 | 7–6 | 1.18 | +8 | 83.7 | 73.0% |
| CS Asia Championships 2026 | 12 | 8–4 | 1.28 | +38 | 83.3 | 73.8% |
| ESL Pro League Season 24 | 12 | 7–5 | 1.07 | +8 | 76.5 | 72.9% |
| BLAST Open Spring 2026 | 11 | 5–6 | 1.17 | +23 | 80.6 | 73.4% |
| Intel Extreme Masters Chengdu 2025 | 11 | 8–3 | 1.23 | +33 | 85.3 | 72.2% |
| Intel Extreme Masters Cologne Major 2026 | 11 | 6–5 | 1.07 | -2 | 76.2 | 74.2% |
| Intel Extreme Masters Rio 2026 | 11 | 8–3 | 1.02 | -30 | 72.9 | 72.5% |
| PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026 | 11 | 7–4 | 1.25 | +30 | 86.9 | 72.6% |
| StarLadder Budapest Major 2025 | 11 | 5–6 | 1.29 | +23 | 83.5 | 76.8% |
| Thunderpick World Championship 2026 | 11 | 6–5 | 0.99 | -19 | 71.1 | 67.7% |
| BLAST Rivals Fall 2025 | 10 | 7–3 | 1.09 | +8 | 77.7 | 70.3% |
| Intel Extreme Masters Kraków 2026 | 10 | 5–5 | 1.31 | +32 | 84.9 | 74.3% |
| Esports World Cup 2026 | 7 | 5–2 | 1.28 | +26 | 86.1 | 73.6% |
| BLAST Bounty Winter 2026: Closed Qualifier | 4 | 4–0 | 1.35 | +18 | 87.2 | 72.8% |
| BLAST Bounty Summer 2026: Closed Qualifier | 3 | 1–2 | 1.31 | +12 | 84.4 | 80.3% |
By opponent
| Opponent | Maps | W–L | Rating | K–D | ADR | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17 | 9–8 | 1.19 | +11 | 82.2 | 71.6% | |
| 17 | 6–11 | 1.10 | +4 | 81.3 | 70.4% | |
| 14 | 6–8 | 1.07 | -2 | 72.0 | 70.3% | |
| 11 | 5–6 | 1.28 | +23 | 87.3 | 70.9% | |
| 9 | 5–4 | 1.08 | +14 | 78.2 | 76.3% | |
| 8 | 4–4 | 1.15 | +4 | 81.9 | 73.2% | |
| 8 | 6–2 | 1.34 | +18 | 86.5 | 80.1% | |
| 8 | 5–3 | 0.99 | -11 | 69.2 | 65.7% | |
| 7 | 6–1 | 1.10 | +17 | 72.8 | 70.5% | |
| 7 | 6–1 | 1.29 | +25 | 89.6 | 82.1% | |
| 6 | 6–0 | 1.48 | +18 | 91.0 | 80.0% | |
| 6 | 3–3 | 0.96 | -9 | 68.3 | 69.7% | |
| 5 | 1–4 | 0.87 | -17 | 66.9 | 62.6% | |
| 5 | 1–4 | 1.07 | 0 | 85.5 | 67.8% | |
| 5 | 4–1 | 1.61 | +37 | 104.7 | 76.6% | |
| 4 | 4–0 | 1.40 | +28 | 93.0 | 75.9% | |
| 3 | 1–2 | 1.31 | +12 | 84.4 | 80.3% | |
| 3 | 2–1 | 1.29 | +14 | 83.3 | 71.5% | |
| 3 | 3–0 | 1.39 | +11 | 89.6 | 78.7% | |
| 3 | 2–1 | 1.10 | -1 | 88.2 | 77.5% | |
| 3 | 2–1 | 1.22 | +11 | 87.9 | 78.1% | |
| 3 | 3–0 | 1.24 | +16 | 79.3 | 72.3% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 1.45 | +8 | 93.1 | 81.6% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 1.17 | +2 | 78.2 | 74.1% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 0.93 | -3 | 67.6 | 66.7% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 1.15 | 0 | 67.3 | 78.9% | |
| 1 | 0–1 | 1.25 | +2 | 86.1 | 73.9% | |
| 1 | 1–0 | 1.19 | +2 | 64.8 | 79.2% | |
| 1 | 1–0 | 2.44 | +12 | 131.1 | 92.9% |
By tier
| Tier | Maps | W–L | Rating | K–D | ADR | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S-Tier | 159 | 95–64 | 1.18 | +216 | 81.1 | 72.8% |
| A-Tier | 7 | 5–2 | 1.33 | +30 | 86.0 | 76.1% |
Worked out from the HLTV scoreboards of the player's maps in this period.
Data: Liquipedia (CC BY-SA 3.0)