
- Rating · 3 mo
- 1.06
- Rating · career
- 1.08
- MVPs
- 0
- EVPs
- 0
- Best Top 20
- –
- Trophies
- 0
- Majors
- 1
HLTV numbers · Career
- Rating 2.0
- 1.08
- KPR
- 0.69
- DPR
- 0.69
- ADR
- 76.0
- KAST
- 72.1%
- HS%
- –
- Maps
- 451
- Rounds
- 10009
- K/D
- 1.00
- K–D
- -16
Opening duels
- Won
- 1199
- Lost
- 1238
- Ratio
- 0.97
Clutches
–
Multi-kills
- 2K
- 1184
- 3K
- 365
- 4K
- 84
- 5K
- 13
Stats: HLTV.org
By map, event and opponentPlayer of the Match ×0
- Maps
- 139
- W–L
- 66–73
- Rating
- 1.03
- K–D
- -176
- ADR
- 69.0
- KAST
- 70.7%
By map
By event
| Event | Maps | W–L | Rating | K–D | ADR | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| StarLadder Budapest Major 2025 | 29 | 19–10 | 1.09 | -3 | 71.3 | 72.9% |
| XSE Pro League 2026 | 14 | 9–5 | 1.03 | -10 | 73.5 | 73.7% |
| Stake Ranked Episode 2 | 12 | 7–5 | 1.23 | +20 | 78.7 | 73.7% |
| BLAST Rivals Spring 2026 | 10 | 4–6 | 0.94 | -14 | 63.6 | 68.7% |
| ESL Pro League Season 23: Online Stage | 10 | 4–6 | 0.87 | -51 | 56.8 | 64.3% |
| PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026 | 10 | 4–6 | 1.06 | -13 | 69.0 | 71.1% |
| Intel Extreme Masters Kraków 2026 | 7 | 2–5 | 0.90 | -29 | 60.2 | 69.5% |
| BLAST Bounty Summer 2026 | 6 | 3–3 | 1.09 | -3 | 67.3 | 67.2% |
| Intel Extreme Masters Atlanta 2026 | 6 | 2–4 | 0.86 | -24 | 67.1 | 64.9% |
| BLAST Bounty Summer 2026: Closed Qualifier | 5 | 4–1 | 1.43 | +25 | 85.3 | 78.5% |
| BLAST Open Spring 2026 | 5 | 1–4 | 1.02 | -8 | 68.8 | 64.6% |
| Esports World Cup 2026 | 5 | 3–2 | 1.22 | +1 | 76.6 | 77.6% |
| FISSURE Playground #3 | 5 | 1–4 | 1.00 | -16 | 69.2 | 70.9% |
| Intel Extreme Masters Chengdu 2025 | 5 | 1–4 | 0.90 | -20 | 62.2 | 69.4% |
| Stake Ranked Episode 4 | 5 | 1–4 | 0.81 | -19 | 60.1 | 66.4% |
| BLAST Bounty Winter 2026: Closed Qualifier | 3 | 1–2 | 1.09 | +5 | 76.8 | 76.8% |
| PGL Bucharest 2026 | 2 | 0–2 | 0.54 | -17 | 42.0 | 56.8% |
By opponent
| Opponent | Maps | W–L | Rating | K–D | ADR | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | 2–7 | 0.95 | -28 | 66.8 | 68.9% | |
| 8 | 2–6 | 0.84 | -30 | 56.9 | 67.0% | |
| 8 | 5–3 | 1.07 | +8 | 76.0 | 73.6% | |
| 7 | 2–5 | 0.89 | -26 | 65.1 | 68.5% | |
| 6 | 4–2 | 1.27 | +12 | 73.6 | 74.0% | |
| 6 | 2–4 | 1.04 | -15 | 69.3 | 73.9% | |
| 6 | 2–4 | 1.23 | +4 | 82.7 | 74.8% | |
| 6 | 2–4 | 1.12 | -5 | 71.7 | 76.3% | |
| 5 | 4–1 | 1.52 | +28 | 96.0 | 79.2% | |
| 5 | 2–3 | 0.91 | -13 | 63.4 | 67.9% | |
| 5 | 2–3 | 1.13 | +3 | 73.0 | 73.4% | |
| 5 | 1–4 | 0.98 | -16 | 70.8 | 64.7% | |
| 4 | 2–2 | 0.97 | -13 | 63.9 | 66.3% | |
| 4 | 1–3 | 0.85 | -18 | 59.2 | 72.2% | |
| 4 | 1–3 | 0.94 | -11 | 60.2 | 62.7% | |
| 4 | 2–2 | 1.13 | 0 | 73.8 | 70.8% | |
| 3 | 2–1 | 1.11 | +7 | 76.1 | 63.7% | |
| 3 | 1–2 | 1.36 | +13 | 82.5 | 65.7% | |
| 3 | 2–1 | 0.91 | -11 | 60.2 | 67.9% | |
| 3 | 3–0 | 1.10 | +7 | 75.3 | 77.6% | |
| 3 | 2–1 | 1.04 | +1 | 59.8 | 73.6% | |
| 3 | 2–1 | 0.82 | -15 | 61.3 | 71.0% | |
| 3 | 2–1 | 0.97 | -5 | 72.1 | 66.7% | |
| 3 | 3–0 | 1.26 | +6 | 83.2 | 78.9% | |
| 3 | 2–1 | 1.00 | -1 | 62.7 | 74.3% | |
| 3 | 1–2 | 0.94 | -9 | 65.9 | 69.8% | |
| 3 | 1–2 | 0.83 | -10 | 59.8 | 74.6% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 1.37 | +5 | 71.2 | 80.0% | |
| 2 | 0–2 | 0.54 | -17 | 42.0 | 56.8% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 1.38 | +3 | 76.2 | 80.0% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 0.79 | -11 | 56.3 | 56.3% | |
| 2 | 0–2 | 0.83 | -8 | 59.2 | 61.5% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 0.89 | -4 | 58.2 | 74.3% | |
| 1 | 1–0 | 1.03 | -1 | 46.2 | 83.3% | |
| 1 | 0–1 | 0.67 | -6 | 65.9 | 57.9% |
By tier
| Tier | Maps | W–L | Rating | K–D | ADR | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S-Tier | 98 | 44–54 | 1.01 | -180 | 67.1 | 69.8% |
| A-Tier | 41 | 22–19 | 1.09 | +4 | 73.4 | 72.7% |
Worked out from the HLTV scoreboards of the player's maps in this period.
Data: Liquipedia (CC BY-SA 3.0)