
- Rating · 3 mo
- 0.94
- Rating · career
- 1.00
- MVPs
- 0
- EVPs
- 0
- Best Top 20
- –
- Trophies
- 2
- Majors
- 3
HLTV numbers · Career
- Rating 2.0
- 1.00
- KPR
- 0.64
- DPR
- 0.70
- ADR
- 70.5
- KAST
- 69.9%
- HS%
- –
- Maps
- 935
- Rounds
- 21690
- K/D
- 0.91
- K–D
- -1393
Opening duels
- Won
- 2386
- Lost
- 2892
- Ratio
- 0.83
Clutches
–
Multi-kills
- 2K
- 2466
- 3K
- 675
- 4K
- 119
- 5K
- 14
Stats: HLTV.org
By map, event and opponentPlayer of the Match ×4
- Maps
- 144
- W–L
- 65–79
- Rating
- 0.99
- K–D
- -246
- ADR
- 66.3
- KAST
- 70.8%
By map
By event
| Event | Maps | W–L | Rating | K–D | ADR | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESL Pro League Season 23: Online Stage | 23 | 13–10 | 0.96 | -28 | 62.5 | 72.3% |
| PGL Bucharest 2026 | 18 | 9–9 | 1.00 | -30 | 69.0 | 73.2% |
| Logitech G Play Connect 2026 | 16 | 10–6 | 1.03 | -23 | 67.0 | 70.1% |
| StarLadder Budapest Major 2025 | 15 | 7–8 | 1.08 | -6 | 73.8 | 73.2% |
| Intel Extreme Masters Kraków 2026 | 11 | 6–5 | 1.21 | +21 | 73.4 | 74.3% |
| Stake Ranked Episode 3 | 9 | 5–4 | 1.00 | -12 | 67.0 | 71.7% |
| 1win Private Club #1 | 7 | 3–4 | 0.85 | -32 | 56.2 | 70.9% |
| Intel Extreme Masters Rio 2026 | 6 | 2–4 | 0.99 | -19 | 69.0 | 71.2% |
| PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026 | 6 | 0–6 | 0.73 | -36 | 50.3 | 60.2% |
| BLAST Bounty Summer 2026: Closed Qualifier | 5 | 4–1 | 1.01 | -3 | 70.1 | 72.2% |
| Intel Extreme Masters Chengdu 2025 | 5 | 1–4 | 1.03 | -5 | 64.1 | 67.5% |
| Stake Ranked Episode 2 | 5 | 1–4 | 1.15 | +3 | 76.9 | 77.0% |
| XSE Pro League 2026 | 5 | 1–4 | 0.58 | -40 | 45.0 | 53.9% |
| CS Asia Championships 2026 | 4 | 1–3 | 1.00 | -7 | 71.7 | 69.6% |
| BLAST Bounty Summer 2026 | 3 | 1–2 | 1.10 | -6 | 67.4 | 73.4% |
| BLAST Bounty Winter 2026: Closed Qualifier | 3 | 1–2 | 0.99 | -15 | 64.7 | 62.9% |
| Esports World Cup 2026 | 3 | 0–3 | 0.81 | -8 | 64.1 | 68.9% |
By opponent
| Opponent | Maps | W–L | Rating | K–D | ADR | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 | 5–3 | 1.05 | -8 | 70.6 | 71.9% | |
| 7 | 6–1 | 1.12 | +1 | 71.7 | 75.6% | |
| 7 | 3–4 | 1.04 | -11 | 61.2 | 65.8% | |
| 7 | 2–5 | 0.99 | -7 | 70.3 | 68.9% | |
| 6 | 0–6 | 0.72 | -29 | 59.5 | 61.8% | |
| 6 | 3–3 | 1.18 | 0 | 70.1 | 78.0% | |
| 6 | 2–4 | 1.02 | -1 | 69.1 | 69.2% | |
| 6 | 0–6 | 0.85 | -26 | 56.8 | 61.6% | |
| 6 | 3–3 | 0.82 | -22 | 52.2 | 67.2% | |
| 5 | 3–2 | 1.05 | -7 | 67.3 | 77.0% | |
| 5 | 1–4 | 0.79 | -28 | 52.1 | 70.2% | |
| 5 | 3–2 | 0.97 | -19 | 61.8 | 70.6% | |
| 5 | 3–2 | 0.94 | -15 | 60.5 | 69.3% | |
| 5 | 4–1 | 1.25 | +14 | 86.6 | 80.7% | |
| 5 | 1–4 | 0.84 | -15 | 61.6 | 73.0% | |
| 4 | 0–4 | 0.91 | -15 | 64.6 | 64.0% | |
| 4 | 2–2 | 0.92 | -6 | 63.4 | 71.6% | |
| 4 | 1–3 | 0.78 | -16 | 54.1 | 67.1% | |
| 3 | 1–2 | 0.90 | -14 | 63.7 | 70.5% | |
| 3 | 1–2 | 0.92 | -11 | 64.9 | 70.3% | |
| 3 | 1–2 | 1.07 | 0 | 65.6 | 70.8% | |
| 3 | 2–1 | 0.99 | -10 | 67.2 | 69.1% | |
| 3 | 1–2 | 1.10 | -6 | 67.4 | 73.4% | |
| 3 | 0–3 | 1.20 | -4 | 64.9 | 63.6% | |
| 3 | 2–1 | 1.02 | -5 | 73.4 | 70.9% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 1.01 | +6 | 66.1 | 81.8% | |
| 2 | 1–1 | 1.14 | -2 | 81.9 | 70.4% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 1.13 | +4 | 74.5 | 76.8% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 1.40 | +13 | 85.9 | 74.5% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 1.37 | +11 | 92.2 | 85.7% | |
| 2 | 0–2 | 0.91 | -6 | 69.5 | 57.1% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 0.92 | +3 | 62.8 | 85.4% | |
| 2 | 0–2 | 1.06 | -2 | 64.4 | 67.5% | |
| 1 | 0–1 | 0.64 | -8 | 57.1 | 50.0% | |
| 1 | 1–0 | 0.82 | -2 | 70.3 | 73.3% | |
| 1 | 1–0 | 1.31 | 0 | 80.8 | 75.0% | |
| 1 | 0–1 | 0.43 | -8 | 34.8 | 63.2% | |
| 1 | 1–0 | 1.18 | +3 | 85.0 | 80.0% | |
| 1 | 1–0 | 1.36 | +2 | 84.8 | 93.8% |
By tier
| Tier | Maps | W–L | Rating | K–D | ADR | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S-Tier | 76 | 31–45 | 1.01 | -94 | 66.6 | 71.2% |
| A-Tier | 68 | 34–34 | 0.98 | -152 | 66.0 | 70.5% |
Worked out from the HLTV scoreboards of the player's maps in this period.
Data: Liquipedia (CC BY-SA 3.0)