
- Rating · 3 mo
- 1.08
- Rating · career
- 1.11
- MVPs
- 1
- EVPs
- 14
- Best Top 20
- #82025
- Trophies
- 12
- Majors
- 8
HLTV numbers · Career
- Rating 1.0
- 1.11
- KPR
- 0.75
- DPR
- 0.64
- ADR
- 82.3
- KAST
- 73.6%
- HS%
- –
- Maps
- 1950
- Rounds
- 48636
- K/D
- 1.17
- K–D
- +5346
Opening duels
- Won
- 5093
- Lost
- 4514
- Ratio
- 1.13
Clutches
–
Multi-kills
- 2K
- 6366
- 3K
- 2172
- 4K
- 478
- 5K
- 49
Stats: HLTV.org
By map, event and opponentPlayer of the Match ×10
- Maps
- 139
- W–L
- 66–73
- Rating
- 1.18
- K–D
- +161
- ADR
- 77.8
- KAST
- 73.4%
By map
By event
| Event | Maps | W–L | Rating | K–D | ADR | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| StarLadder Budapest Major 2025 | 29 | 19–10 | 1.27 | +67 | 81.8 | 74.7% |
| XSE Pro League 2026 | 14 | 9–5 | 1.35 | +66 | 84.3 | 74.9% |
| Stake Ranked Episode 2 | 12 | 7–5 | 1.27 | +41 | 77.3 | 75.1% |
| BLAST Rivals Spring 2026 | 10 | 4–6 | 1.19 | +2 | 77.0 | 74.8% |
| ESL Pro League Season 23: Online Stage | 10 | 4–6 | 1.26 | +20 | 81.1 | 73.1% |
| PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026 | 10 | 4–6 | 1.06 | -10 | 69.7 | 72.5% |
| Intel Extreme Masters Kraków 2026 | 7 | 2–5 | 1.10 | -7 | 78.5 | 75.0% |
| BLAST Bounty Summer 2026 | 6 | 3–3 | 1.07 | -6 | 72.1 | 74.6% |
| Intel Extreme Masters Atlanta 2026 | 6 | 2–4 | 1.27 | +14 | 82.7 | 78.1% |
| BLAST Bounty Summer 2026: Closed Qualifier | 5 | 4–1 | 1.12 | 0 | 77.9 | 74.8% |
| BLAST Open Spring 2026 | 5 | 1–4 | 1.02 | +4 | 65.8 | 69.0% |
| Esports World Cup 2026 | 5 | 3–2 | 1.19 | +6 | 78.6 | 74.8% |
| FISSURE Playground #3 | 5 | 1–4 | 1.01 | -18 | 73.6 | 69.4% |
| Intel Extreme Masters Chengdu 2025 | 5 | 1–4 | 1.03 | -4 | 78.9 | 70.4% |
| Stake Ranked Episode 4 | 5 | 1–4 | 0.85 | -13 | 64.9 | 63.1% |
| BLAST Bounty Winter 2026: Closed Qualifier | 3 | 1–2 | 1.33 | +6 | 82.6 | 73.2% |
| PGL Bucharest 2026 | 2 | 0–2 | 0.81 | -7 | 72.4 | 63.6% |
By opponent
| Opponent | Maps | W–L | Rating | K–D | ADR | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | 2–7 | 1.30 | +25 | 85.4 | 74.9% | |
| 8 | 2–6 | 0.98 | -17 | 68.9 | 66.5% | |
| 8 | 5–3 | 1.26 | +10 | 83.5 | 72.5% | |
| 7 | 2–5 | 1.03 | -16 | 69.3 | 68.5% | |
| 6 | 4–2 | 1.18 | +12 | 85.9 | 71.2% | |
| 6 | 2–4 | 1.23 | +8 | 82.9 | 74.8% | |
| 6 | 2–4 | 1.15 | +6 | 76.2 | 72.9% | |
| 6 | 2–4 | 1.22 | +16 | 80.8 | 77.0% | |
| 5 | 4–1 | 1.14 | +13 | 74.4 | 77.2% | |
| 5 | 2–3 | 1.14 | +2 | 81.3 | 74.1% | |
| 5 | 2–3 | 1.16 | +6 | 76.6 | 74.2% | |
| 5 | 1–4 | 1.14 | +3 | 75.5 | 73.3% | |
| 4 | 2–2 | 1.06 | -10 | 75.6 | 65.1% | |
| 4 | 1–3 | 1.15 | +7 | 68.7 | 67.8% | |
| 4 | 1–3 | 0.91 | -10 | 63.3 | 63.8% | |
| 4 | 2–2 | 1.01 | -11 | 68.8 | 74.2% | |
| 3 | 2–1 | 1.27 | +11 | 70.6 | 75.8% | |
| 3 | 1–2 | 0.95 | +1 | 63.6 | 76.2% | |
| 3 | 2–1 | 1.01 | -7 | 65.2 | 80.3% | |
| 3 | 3–0 | 1.56 | +19 | 93.6 | 79.3% | |
| 3 | 2–1 | 1.44 | +5 | 76.3 | 81.2% | |
| 3 | 2–1 | 1.30 | +4 | 80.5 | 71.0% | |
| 3 | 2–1 | 1.35 | +8 | 85.5 | 79.4% | |
| 3 | 3–0 | 1.22 | +3 | 81.0 | 77.5% | |
| 3 | 2–1 | 1.56 | +15 | 89.1 | 79.7% | |
| 3 | 1–2 | 0.92 | -3 | 59.1 | 74.6% | |
| 3 | 1–2 | 1.19 | +3 | 93.8 | 74.6% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 1.41 | +7 | 91.0 | 85.0% | |
| 2 | 0–2 | 0.81 | -7 | 72.4 | 63.6% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 1.35 | +8 | 80.8 | 82.5% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 1.33 | +11 | 85.5 | 77.0% | |
| 2 | 0–2 | 0.81 | -7 | 64.1 | 57.7% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 2.04 | +27 | 119.3 | 80.0% | |
| 1 | 1–0 | 2.10 | +18 | 131.8 | 94.4% | |
| 1 | 0–1 | 1.15 | +1 | 55.6 | 68.4% |
By tier
| Tier | Maps | W–L | Rating | K–D | ADR | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S-Tier | 98 | 44–54 | 1.17 | +68 | 77.6 | 73.7% |
| A-Tier | 41 | 22–19 | 1.21 | +93 | 78.2 | 72.8% |
Worked out from the HLTV scoreboards of the player's maps in this period.
Data: Liquipedia (CC BY-SA 3.0)