
- Rating · 3 mo
- 1.04
- Rating · career
- 1.09
- MVPs
- 0
- EVPs
- 1
- Best Top 20
- –
- Trophies
- 2
- Majors
- 1
HLTV numbers · Career
- Rating 3.0
- 1.09
- KPR
- 0.66
- DPR
- 0.64
- ADR
- 74.6
- KAST
- 74.6%
- HS%
- –
- Maps
- 647
- Rounds
- 14062
- K/D
- 1.03
- K–D
- +298
Opening duels
- Won
- 1238
- Lost
- 1106
- Ratio
- 1.12
Clutches
–
Multi-kills
- 2K
- 1626
- 3K
- 466
- 4K
- 89
- 5K
- 4
Stats: HLTV.org
By map, event and opponentPlayer of the Match ×6
- Maps
- 146
- W–L
- 82–64
- Rating
- 1.14
- K–D
- +88
- ADR
- 74.4
- KAST
- 74.6%
By map
By event
| Event | Maps | W–L | Rating | K–D | ADR | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESL Pro League Season 23: Online Stage | 19 | 11–8 | 1.14 | +17 | 76.2 | 74.2% |
| Intel Extreme Masters Cologne Major 2026 | 19 | 10–9 | 1.15 | +7 | 75.9 | 75.3% |
| Esports World Cup 2026 | 16 | 10–6 | 1.12 | +6 | 74.5 | 74.0% |
| Intel Extreme Masters Kraków 2026 | 15 | 9–6 | 1.05 | +4 | 64.6 | 73.3% |
| PGL Bucharest 2026 | 15 | 13–2 | 1.30 | +56 | 82.7 | 78.4% |
| PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026 | 13 | 6–7 | 1.14 | 0 | 71.9 | 73.5% |
| BLAST Open Fall 2026 | 9 | 4–5 | 1.00 | -25 | 70.0 | 76.1% |
| ESL Pro League Season 23 | 9 | 4–5 | 1.03 | -17 | 67.8 | 73.4% |
| PGL Masters Bucharest 2026 | 9 | 6–3 | 1.04 | -1 | 69.0 | 73.2% |
| Intel Extreme Masters Atlanta 2026 | 7 | 3–4 | 1.24 | +19 | 81.8 | 73.6% |
| BLAST Bounty Summer 2026: Closed Qualifier | 5 | 2–3 | 1.24 | +3 | 84.5 | 74.5% |
| BLAST Bounty Winter 2026: Closed Qualifier | 5 | 3–2 | 1.53 | +26 | 87.4 | 82.3% |
| BLAST Rivals Spring 2026 | 5 | 1–4 | 1.05 | -7 | 69.7 | 66.7% |
By opponent
| Opponent | Maps | W–L | Rating | K–D | ADR | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17 | 8–9 | 1.14 | +20 | 76.2 | 75.3% | |
| 13 | 8–5 | 1.19 | +15 | 75.5 | 73.6% | |
| 12 | 6–6 | 1.08 | -3 | 71.5 | 73.3% | |
| 11 | 6–5 | 1.09 | -13 | 66.9 | 73.5% | |
| 11 | 4–7 | 1.02 | -12 | 69.8 | 71.6% | |
| 10 | 7–3 | 1.10 | -3 | 76.3 | 71.8% | |
| 7 | 1–6 | 1.10 | -11 | 71.1 | 72.6% | |
| 5 | 4–1 | 1.17 | +9 | 75.7 | 82.7% | |
| 5 | 3–2 | 1.02 | +1 | 67.9 | 75.2% | |
| 4 | 2–2 | 0.94 | -12 | 62.4 | 72.2% | |
| 4 | 4–0 | 1.71 | +37 | 99.1 | 85.4% | |
| 4 | 4–0 | 1.17 | +5 | 71.6 | 72.1% | |
| 4 | 4–0 | 1.14 | +8 | 64.8 | 83.5% | |
| 4 | 1–3 | 1.06 | -2 | 75.8 | 72.0% | |
| 3 | 2–1 | 1.54 | +15 | 94.5 | 83.6% | |
| 3 | 2–1 | 1.19 | +3 | 73.4 | 72.0% | |
| 3 | 2–1 | 1.07 | -5 | 70.9 | 78.0% | |
| 3 | 2–1 | 1.37 | +14 | 86.7 | 79.7% | |
| 3 | 1–2 | 0.71 | -20 | 52.7 | 64.5% | |
| 3 | 2–1 | 1.27 | +12 | 82.9 | 79.1% | |
| 3 | 2–1 | 1.16 | 0 | 85.1 | 69.7% | |
| 3 | 2–1 | 1.30 | +5 | 82.3 | 79.4% | |
| 3 | 1–2 | 1.17 | +5 | 74.0 | 69.1% | |
| 2 | 0–2 | 1.00 | +1 | 70.0 | 67.5% | |
| 2 | 0–2 | 1.11 | +3 | 85.7 | 71.7% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 1.62 | +14 | 91.3 | 85.5% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 1.28 | +2 | 80.0 | 75.5% |
By tier
| Tier | Maps | W–L | Rating | K–D | ADR | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S-Tier | 121 | 64–57 | 1.10 | +3 | 72.5 | 73.8% |
| A-Tier | 25 | 18–7 | 1.34 | +85 | 84.0 | 78.5% |
Worked out from the HLTV scoreboards of the player's maps in this period.
Data: Liquipedia (CC BY-SA 3.0)