
- Rating · 3 mo
- 1.09
- Rating · career
- 1.17
- MVPs
- 0
- EVPs
- 1
- Best Top 20
- –
- Trophies
- 4
- Majors
- 6
HLTV numbers · Career
- Rating 2.0
- 1.17
- KPR
- 0.74
- DPR
- 0.64
- ADR
- 81.2
- KAST
- 73.2%
- HS%
- –
- Maps
- 1308
- Rounds
- 31418
- K/D
- 1.15
- K–D
- +2985
Opening duels
- Won
- 3851
- Lost
- 3188
- Ratio
- 1.21
Clutches
–
Multi-kills
- 2K
- 4249
- 3K
- 1249
- 4K
- 255
- 5K
- 26
Stats: HLTV.org
By map, event and opponentPlayer of the Match ×3
- Maps
- 166
- W–L
- 93–73
- Rating
- 1.14
- K–D
- +174
- ADR
- 80.7
- KAST
- 73.3%
By map
By event
| Event | Maps | W–L | Rating | K–D | ADR | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESL Pro League Season 23: Online Stage | 16 | 13–3 | 1.21 | +58 | 87.7 | 76.3% |
| PGL Masters Bucharest 2025 | 16 | 9–7 | 1.08 | 0 | 78.0 | 71.4% |
| Intel Extreme Masters Cologne Major 2026 | 15 | 7–8 | 1.12 | +2 | 80.3 | 70.9% |
| CS Asia Championships 2026 | 14 | 10–4 | 1.20 | +28 | 82.4 | 74.7% |
| Esports World Cup 2026 | 14 | 9–5 | 1.13 | +10 | 77.9 | 79.7% |
| FISSURE Playground #3 | 13 | 11–2 | 1.19 | +29 | 81.7 | 77.0% |
| PGL Bucharest 2026 | 13 | 6–7 | 1.08 | +9 | 76.2 | 73.1% |
| Intel Extreme Masters Atlanta 2026 | 12 | 9–3 | 1.27 | +39 | 83.6 | 74.6% |
| ESL Pro League Season 24 | 10 | 4–6 | 1.02 | -16 | 80.0 | 70.5% |
| BLAST Open Fall 2026 | 8 | 4–4 | 1.21 | +7 | 85.5 | 72.4% |
| PGL Masters Bucharest 2026 | 8 | 2–6 | 1.12 | -4 | 79.5 | 74.2% |
| Thunderpick World Championship 2026 | 8 | 4–4 | 1.09 | +5 | 76.7 | 67.3% |
| StarLadder Budapest Major 2025 | 7 | 3–4 | 1.13 | +13 | 74.8 | 71.4% |
| Intel Extreme Masters Rio 2026 | 5 | 1–4 | 1.19 | +10 | 81.8 | 67.0% |
| Intel Extreme Masters Kraków 2026 | 4 | 0–4 | 1.01 | -18 | 78.9 | 65.1% |
| ESL Pro League Season 23 | 3 | 1–2 | 1.06 | +2 | 79.9 | 71.9% |
By opponent
| Opponent | Maps | W–L | Rating | K–D | ADR | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 | 9–6 | 1.11 | +12 | 78.4 | 72.3% | |
| 11 | 4–7 | 1.14 | +6 | 85.1 | 69.3% | |
| 11 | 7–4 | 1.19 | +19 | 81.7 | 74.8% | |
| 11 | 6–5 | 1.05 | -9 | 76.6 | 68.7% | |
| 9 | 6–3 | 1.20 | +25 | 78.5 | 71.8% | |
| 8 | 5–3 | 1.15 | +5 | 81.5 | 75.9% | |
| 7 | 5–2 | 1.06 | -4 | 78.0 | 77.3% | |
| 7 | 5–2 | 1.09 | +12 | 76.7 | 74.8% | |
| 6 | 1–5 | 1.04 | +2 | 76.9 | 70.8% | |
| 5 | 3–2 | 1.05 | +3 | 81.4 | 66.4% | |
| 5 | 1–4 | 1.12 | -1 | 81.7 | 68.7% | |
| 5 | 2–3 | 1.11 | +11 | 79.9 | 75.9% | |
| 4 | 4–0 | 1.18 | +15 | 81.1 | 78.7% | |
| 4 | 2–2 | 0.97 | -16 | 83.6 | 66.7% | |
| 4 | 3–1 | 0.92 | -5 | 64.1 | 64.4% | |
| 4 | 3–1 | 1.26 | +14 | 94.1 | 74.2% | |
| 4 | 4–0 | 1.31 | +15 | 83.0 | 82.0% | |
| 3 | 1–2 | 1.34 | +7 | 96.2 | 75.4% | |
| 3 | 2–1 | 1.10 | 0 | 82.3 | 80.9% | |
| 3 | 2–1 | 1.26 | +14 | 83.8 | 75.8% | |
| 3 | 3–0 | 1.30 | +13 | 78.5 | 83.6% | |
| 3 | 2–1 | 1.05 | +2 | 80.0 | 71.9% | |
| 3 | 1–2 | 1.40 | +15 | 87.6 | 68.5% | |
| 3 | 2–1 | 1.29 | +11 | 85.2 | 75.7% | |
| 3 | 2–1 | 1.34 | +11 | 82.3 | 76.2% | |
| 2 | 0–2 | 0.88 | -11 | 68.8 | 64.3% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 1.48 | +9 | 87.3 | 80.5% | |
| 2 | 0–2 | 1.22 | -7 | 79.3 | 69.8% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 1.00 | 0 | 68.2 | 74.1% | |
| 2 | 0–2 | 1.02 | -8 | 75.7 | 85.0% | |
| 2 | 0–2 | 1.14 | +2 | 74.5 | 64.0% | |
| 2 | 0–2 | 1.03 | -8 | 74.7 | 66.7% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 1.10 | +3 | 83.2 | 75.6% | |
| 2 | 0–2 | 1.40 | +2 | 100.7 | 88.6% | |
| 2 | 0–2 | 0.93 | -3 | 76.0 | 78.6% | |
| 1 | 1–0 | 1.74 | +11 | 94.7 | 94.7% | |
| 1 | 1–0 | 1.69 | +7 | 102.5 | 84.2% |
By tier
| Tier | Maps | W–L | Rating | K–D | ADR | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S-Tier | 137 | 78–59 | 1.16 | +165 | 81.4 | 73.5% |
| A-Tier | 29 | 15–14 | 1.08 | +9 | 77.3 | 72.1% |
Worked out from the HLTV scoreboards of the player's maps in this period.
Data: Liquipedia (CC BY-SA 3.0)