
- Rating · 3 mo
- 1.04
- Rating · career
- 1.08
- MVPs
- 0
- EVPs
- 0
- Best Top 20
- –
- Trophies
- 2
- Majors
- 2
HLTV numbers · Career
- Rating 2.0
- 1.08
- KPR
- 0.68
- DPR
- 0.68
- ADR
- 76.2
- KAST
- 71.6%
- HS%
- –
- Maps
- 970
- Rounds
- 22114
- K/D
- 1.00
- K–D
- +10
Opening duels
- Won
- 2350
- Lost
- 2522
- Ratio
- 0.93
Clutches
–
Multi-kills
- 2K
- 2708
- 3K
- 795
- 4K
- 175
- 5K
- 18
Stats: HLTV.org
By map, event and opponentPlayer of the Match ×3
- Maps
- 137
- W–L
- 72–65
- Rating
- 1.00
- K–D
- -255
- ADR
- 66.8
- KAST
- 70.4%
By map
By event
| Event | Maps | W–L | Rating | K–D | ADR | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026 | 23 | 12–11 | 1.01 | -44 | 68.2 | 67.7% |
| StarLadder Budapest Major 2025 | 18 | 10–8 | 0.96 | -62 | 66.0 | 71.6% |
| PGL Bucharest 2026 | 14 | 7–7 | 0.91 | -51 | 60.4 | 69.6% |
| BLAST Open Spring 2026 | 12 | 7–5 | 1.12 | +2 | 72.6 | 73.0% |
| Intel Extreme Masters Kraków 2026 | 12 | 6–6 | 1.10 | +3 | 69.4 | 73.5% |
| ESL Pro League Season 23: Online Stage | 11 | 5–6 | 0.94 | -9 | 58.6 | 68.6% |
| ESL Pro League Season 24 | 11 | 6–5 | 1.17 | +5 | 81.0 | 73.6% |
| PGL Astana 2026 | 9 | 3–6 | 0.93 | -16 | 64.7 | 66.8% |
| BLAST Bounty Winter 2026 | 8 | 7–1 | 1.04 | -8 | 73.8 | 75.0% |
| Intel Extreme Masters Cologne Major 2026 | 8 | 2–6 | 0.83 | -37 | 54.5 | 70.1% |
| CS Asia Championships 2026 | 7 | 3–4 | 0.89 | -32 | 64.1 | 62.5% |
| BLAST Bounty Winter 2026: Closed Qualifier | 4 | 4–0 | 1.05 | -6 | 69.8 | 77.3% |
By opponent
| Opponent | Maps | W–L | Rating | K–D | ADR | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12 | 6–6 | 0.91 | -33 | 60.4 | 69.4% | |
| 9 | 5–4 | 1.06 | -12 | 71.5 | 69.2% | |
| 8 | 3–5 | 0.97 | -13 | 64.1 | 68.2% | |
| 8 | 7–1 | 1.07 | -9 | 74.4 | 72.3% | |
| 7 | 2–5 | 0.95 | -19 | 65.0 | 65.2% | |
| 7 | 6–1 | 1.24 | +1 | 84.6 | 79.0% | |
| 7 | 0–7 | 0.93 | -17 | 65.1 | 63.6% | |
| 6 | 3–3 | 0.84 | -29 | 61.0 | 63.2% | |
| 6 | 2–4 | 0.81 | -17 | 57.1 | 70.8% | |
| 5 | 1–4 | 1.01 | -18 | 69.5 | 74.6% | |
| 5 | 1–4 | 0.79 | -24 | 48.5 | 62.9% | |
| 5 | 3–2 | 1.22 | +7 | 75.6 | 78.7% | |
| 5 | 3–2 | 1.08 | 0 | 74.3 | 69.1% | |
| 5 | 2–3 | 0.99 | -9 | 68.4 | 68.8% | |
| 5 | 2–3 | 1.01 | -4 | 59.3 | 72.3% | |
| 5 | 4–1 | 1.03 | -8 | 61.7 | 73.2% | |
| 5 | 1–4 | 0.96 | -15 | 60.9 | 63.1% | |
| 3 | 2–1 | 1.11 | +4 | 73.1 | 77.0% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 0.99 | -7 | 71.1 | 74.2% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 1.24 | +6 | 71.0 | 78.9% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 1.34 | +8 | 87.7 | 90.9% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 1.20 | +6 | 80.3 | 79.3% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 0.85 | -12 | 56.5 | 68.9% | |
| 2 | 0–2 | 1.18 | 0 | 90.1 | 61.1% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 1.33 | +13 | 78.1 | 71.4% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 0.97 | -8 | 59.8 | 76.3% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 0.78 | -17 | 61.1 | 70.5% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 1.17 | +1 | 71.9 | 74.1% | |
| 1 | 0–1 | 0.78 | -4 | 59.0 | 75.0% | |
| 1 | 0–1 | 0.67 | -6 | 54.7 | 68.2% | |
| 1 | 0–1 | 0.37 | -12 | 32.5 | 55.6% | |
| 1 | 1–0 | 0.65 | -8 | 51.8 | 71.4% |
By tier
| Tier | Maps | W–L | Rating | K–D | ADR | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S-Tier | 119 | 61–58 | 1.01 | -198 | 67.5 | 70.3% |
| A-Tier | 18 | 11–7 | 0.94 | -57 | 62.4 | 71.3% |
Worked out from the HLTV scoreboards of the player's maps in this period.
Data: Liquipedia (CC BY-SA 3.0)