
- Rating · 3 mo
- 1.14
- Rating · career
- 1.11
- MVPs
- 1
- EVPs
- 4
- Best Top 20
- –
- Trophies
- 5
- Majors
- 5
HLTV numbers · Career
- Rating 2.0
- 1.11
- KPR
- 0.72
- DPR
- 0.62
- ADR
- 72.9
- KAST
- 71.6%
- HS%
- –
- Maps
- 674
- Rounds
- 15343
- K/D
- 1.15
- K–D
- +1414
Opening duels
- Won
- 1740
- Lost
- 1227
- Ratio
- 1.42
Clutches
–
Multi-kills
- 2K
- 1968
- 3K
- 622
- 4K
- 106
- 5K
- 6
Stats: HLTV.org
By map, event and opponentPlayer of the Match ×17
- Maps
- 167
- W–L
- 86–81
- Rating
- 1.19
- K–D
- +446
- ADR
- 76.0
- KAST
- 72.0%
By map
By event
| Event | Maps | W–L | Rating | K–D | ADR | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026 | 19 | 9–10 | 1.21 | +53 | 77.0 | 72.5% |
| PGL Bucharest 2026 | 15 | 10–5 | 1.21 | +43 | 74.6 | 72.1% |
| 1win Private Club #2 | 14 | 11–3 | 1.32 | +63 | 77.1 | 75.0% |
| Intel Extreme Masters Chengdu 2025 | 13 | 6–7 | 1.27 | +63 | 80.7 | 72.4% |
| Intel Extreme Masters Cologne Major 2026 | 13 | 6–7 | 1.11 | +11 | 69.7 | 69.7% |
| CS Asia Championships 2026 | 12 | 7–5 | 1.31 | +58 | 79.3 | 73.4% |
| PGL Astana 2026 | 11 | 5–6 | 1.23 | +41 | 74.8 | 76.1% |
| PGL Masters Bucharest 2026 | 11 | 4–7 | 1.01 | +5 | 72.8 | 67.5% |
| BLAST Open Spring 2026 | 10 | 6–4 | 1.09 | +23 | 73.4 | 73.5% |
| ESL Pro League Season 23: Online Stage | 9 | 6–3 | 1.14 | +15 | 71.4 | 68.3% |
| Esports World Cup 2026 | 8 | 4–4 | 1.16 | +18 | 81.7 | 66.7% |
| StarLadder Budapest Major 2025 | 7 | 4–3 | 1.09 | +11 | 72.7 | 73.4% |
| BLAST Bounty Summer 2026: Closed Qualifier | 5 | 4–1 | 1.36 | +29 | 90.0 | 78.4% |
| BLAST Rivals Fall 2025 | 5 | 1–4 | 1.02 | -3 | 67.9 | 70.0% |
| FISSURE Playground #3 | 5 | 1–4 | 1.20 | +16 | 82.0 | 73.9% |
| Intel Extreme Masters Kraków 2026 | 5 | 1–4 | 1.20 | -2 | 76.8 | 68.9% |
| BLAST Bounty Summer 2026 | 3 | 1–2 | 1.21 | +7 | 82.8 | 75.4% |
| ESL Pro League Season 23 | 2 | 0–2 | 0.83 | -5 | 65.5 | 53.7% |
By opponent
| Opponent | Maps | W–L | Rating | K–D | ADR | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | 4–7 | 0.93 | -17 | 66.8 | 66.2% | |
| 11 | 1–10 | 0.86 | -36 | 61.8 | 62.4% | |
| 10 | 8–2 | 1.23 | +45 | 80.2 | 74.7% | |
| 9 | 4–5 | 1.10 | +24 | 68.8 | 66.9% | |
| 9 | 4–5 | 1.20 | +29 | 73.1 | 73.8% | |
| 8 | 5–3 | 1.43 | +56 | 85.5 | 75.3% | |
| 8 | 3–5 | 1.18 | +7 | 74.5 | 72.9% | |
| 8 | 2–6 | 1.07 | +7 | 70.9 | 73.5% | |
| 8 | 7–1 | 1.31 | +35 | 71.4 | 80.3% | |
| 6 | 4–2 | 1.30 | +28 | 81.0 | 76.6% | |
| 6 | 4–2 | 1.39 | +41 | 85.9 | 76.1% | |
| 6 | 5–1 | 1.20 | +25 | 77.4 | 75.9% | |
| 5 | 4–1 | 1.27 | +20 | 73.1 | 70.8% | |
| 5 | 2–3 | 1.27 | +7 | 73.9 | 67.0% | |
| 5 | 3–2 | 1.10 | +5 | 70.2 | 67.0% | |
| 5 | 1–4 | 0.92 | -3 | 69.2 | 70.3% | |
| 5 | 5–0 | 1.45 | +36 | 88.9 | 76.9% | |
| 4 | 0–4 | 1.23 | +16 | 85.1 | 69.0% | |
| 4 | 2–2 | 1.41 | +18 | 92.2 | 74.2% | |
| 4 | 4–0 | 1.30 | +20 | 90.1 | 78.2% | |
| 3 | 1–2 | 1.26 | +9 | 86.1 | 65.7% | |
| 3 | 1–2 | 1.40 | +18 | 84.7 | 76.8% | |
| 3 | 2–1 | 1.17 | +11 | 72.2 | 75.7% | |
| 3 | 1–2 | 1.08 | +1 | 65.5 | 70.5% | |
| 2 | 0–2 | 0.89 | -2 | 77.9 | 69.6% | |
| 2 | 0–2 | 0.76 | -8 | 57.0 | 59.5% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 1.27 | +10 | 83.0 | 73.4% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 1.23 | +11 | 73.4 | 75.0% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 1.43 | +10 | 84.3 | 65.0% | |
| 2 | 0–2 | 1.24 | +3 | 81.1 | 69.8% | |
| 2 | 0–2 | 0.94 | -4 | 84.0 | 69.2% | |
| 2 | 2–0 | 1.54 | +14 | 81.8 | 79.5% | |
| 1 | 0–1 | 0.76 | -1 | 58.4 | 70.0% | |
| 1 | 1–0 | 1.78 | +11 | 104.5 | 81.2% |
By tier
| Tier | Maps | W–L | Rating | K–D | ADR | KAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S-Tier | 133 | 61–72 | 1.16 | +311 | 75.5 | 71.4% |
| A-Tier | 34 | 25–9 | 1.28 | +135 | 78.1 | 74.3% |
Worked out from the HLTV scoreboards of the player's maps in this period.
Data: Liquipedia (CC BY-SA 3.0)